Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: dts: sun9i: Add A80 PRCM clocks and reset control nodes

From: [email-masked] (Maxime Ripard)
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 10:03:09 +0200

On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 11:25:18PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <[email-masked]> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:10:05AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> This adds the PRCM clocks and reset controls to the A80 dtsi.
> >>
> >> The list of apbs clock gates is incomplete. Tests show that bits 0~20
> >> are mutable. We will need documents from Allwinner to complete the
> >> support.
> >>
> >> Also update clock and reset phandles for r_uart.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <[email-masked]>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80.dtsi | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80.dtsi
> >> index d3dece2eea72..f0869ff8006f 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun9i-a80.dtsi
> >> @@ -169,6 +169,14 @@
> >>                                            "usb_phy2", "usb_hsic_12M";
> >>               };
> >>
> >> +             pll3: clk at 06000008 {
> >> +                     /* placeholder until implemented */
> >> +                     #clock-cells = <0>;
> >> +                     compatible = "fixed-clock";
> >> +                     clock-rate = <0>;
> >> +                     clock-output-names = "pll3";
> >> +             };
> >> +
> >>               pll4: clk at 0600000c {
> >>                       #clock-cells = <0>;
> >>                       compatible = "allwinner,sun9i-a80-pll4-clk";
> >> @@ -751,13 +759,67 @@
> >>                       interrupts = <GIC_SPI 36 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> >>               };
> >>
> >> +             prcm at 08001400 {
> >> +                     compatible = "allwinner,sun9i-a80-prcm";
> >> +                     reg = <0x08001400 0x200>;
> >> +
> >> +                     cpus_clk: cpus_clk {
> >
> > I wonder whether it would not be more readable to have this as
> > clk@<prcm_offset>, just like all the other clocks?
> 
> I agree it is more readable, though it is purely aesthetics. What offset
> did you have in mind? Offset from PRCM base (0x08001400)? Or the complete
> address?

I'd say the offset within the PRCM.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150505/195c3cfe/attachment-0001.sig>