From: bp@alien8•de (Borislav Petkov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] EDAC: Cleanup atomic_scrub mess
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 15:37:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150528133706.GC31800@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150528123448.GA2067@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 01:34:49PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm•linux.org.uk>
Thanks!
I've got all the ACKs now :-)
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > index 45df48ba0b12..325d6f3a596a 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> > @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ config ARM
> > select CLONE_BACKWARDS
> > select CPU_PM if (SUSPEND || CPU_IDLE)
> > select DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS if HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
> > + select EDAC_SUPPORT
> > + select EDAC_ATOMIC_SCRUB
>
> I wonder if it would make sense to conditionalise EDAC_SUPPORT on...
> if CPU_32v6 || CPU_32v7
I guess you can.
Especially if no newer 32-bit ARM would need the scrubbing anymore.
Disadvantage is, if turns out CPU_32v8 (would there even be v8, no
idea...) and newer would need it after all, you'd have to explicitly
enable it.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-28 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-18 23:24 [PATCH v10 0/4] edac: Add APM X-Gene SoC EDAC driver Loc Ho
2015-05-18 23:24 ` [PATCH v10 1/5] arm64: Enable EDAC on ARM64 Loc Ho
2015-05-18 23:24 ` [PATCH v10 2/5] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for APM X-Gene SoC EDAC driver Loc Ho
2015-05-18 23:24 ` [PATCH v10 3/5] Documentation: Add documentation for the APM X-Gene SoC EDAC DTS binding Loc Ho
2015-05-18 23:24 ` [PATCH v10 4/5] edac: Add APM X-Gene SoC EDAC driver Loc Ho
2015-05-18 23:24 ` [PATCH v10 5/5] arm64: Add APM X-Gene SoC EDAC DTS entries Loc Ho
2015-05-22 8:23 ` [PATCH v10 4/5] edac: Add APM X-Gene SoC EDAC driver Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-22 8:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-05-22 8:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-22 18:28 ` Loc Ho
2015-05-22 18:25 ` Loc Ho
2015-05-22 8:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-22 8:02 ` [PATCH v10 3/5] Documentation: Add documentation for the APM X-Gene SoC EDAC DTS binding Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-19 17:03 ` [PATCH v10 1/5] arm64: Enable EDAC on ARM64 Borislav Petkov
2015-05-19 19:57 ` Loc Ho
2015-05-19 20:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-05-21 18:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-05-21 18:11 ` [RFC PATCH] EDAC: Cleanup atomic_scrub mess Borislav Petkov
2015-05-22 20:13 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-05-27 15:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-05-28 2:27 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-05-28 12:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-28 13:37 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2015-05-22 8:24 ` [PATCH v10 0/4] edac: Add APM X-Gene SoC EDAC driver Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150528133706.GC31800@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8$(echo .)de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox