Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] irqchip: dw-apb-ictl: add irq_set_affinity support

From: [email-masked] (Jisheng Zhang)
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 21:10:35 +0800

On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 12:30:01 +0200
Thomas Gleixner <[email-masked]> wrote:

> On Mon, 6 Jul 2015, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > +static int dw_apb_ictl_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
> > +				    const struct cpumask *mask_val,
> > +				    bool force)
> > +{
> > +	struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> > +	struct dw_apb_ictl_priv *priv = gc->private;
> > +	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_get_chip(priv->parent_irq);
> > +	struct irq_data *data = irq_get_irq_data(priv->parent_irq);
> > +
> > +	if (chip && chip->irq_set_affinity)
> > +		return chip->irq_set_affinity(data, mask_val, force);
> 
> This is wrong as it lacks proper locking of the parent irq. That needs
> to be solved at the core code level in a clean way.

Is it acceptable to call irq_set_affinity() or irq_force_affinity() as the
following:

if (force)
	return irq_force_affinity(priv->parent_irq, mask_val);
else
	return irq_set_affinity(priv->parent_irq, mask_val);

Thanks,
Jisheng