public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm•com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 9/9] ARM: software-based priviledged-no-access support
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 15:05:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150825140552.GH21300@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1ZSmQG-0002za-E3@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 02:31:56PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> Provide a software-based implementation of the priviledged no access
> support found in ARMv8.1.
> 
> Userspace pages are mapped using a different domain number from the
> kernel and IO mappings.  If we switch the user domain to "no access"
> when we enter the kernel, we can prevent the kernel from touching
> userspace.
> 
> However, the kernel needs to be able to access userspace via the
> various user accessor functions.  With the wrapping in the previous
> patch, we can temporarily enable access when the kernel needs user
> access, and re-disable it afterwards.
> 
> This allows us to trap non-intended accesses to userspace, eg, caused
> by an inadvertent dereference of the LIST_POISON* values, which, with
> appropriate user mappings setup, can be made to succeed.  This in turn
> can allow use-after-free bugs to be further exploited than would
> otherwise be possible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm•linux.org.uk>
> ---
>  arch/arm/Kconfig               | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/include/asm/domain.h  | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/kernel/entry-header.S | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/kernel/process.c      | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
>  5 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-header.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-header.S
> index 3aa6c3742182..bec7ee0764e1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-header.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-header.S
> @@ -54,15 +54,40 @@
>  	.endm
>  
>  	.macro	uaccess_disable, tmp
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN
> +	/*
> +	 * Whenever we re-enter userspace, the domains should always be
> +	 * set appropriately.
> +	 */
> +	mov	\tmp, #DACR_UACCESS_DISABLE
> +	mcr	p15, 0, \tmp, c3, c0, 0		@ Set domain register
> +#endif

Missing ISB?

>  	.endm
>  
>  	.macro	uaccess_enable, tmp
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN
> +	/*
> +	 * Whenever we re-enter userspace, the domains should always be
> +	 * set appropriately.
> +	 */
> +	mov	\tmp, #DACR_UACCESS_ENABLE
> +	mcr	p15, 0, \tmp, c3, c0, 0
> +#endif
>  	.endm
>  
>  	.macro	uaccess_save_and_disable, tmp
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN
> +	mrc	p15, 0, \tmp, c3, c0, 0
> +	str	\tmp, [sp, #S_FRAME_SIZE]
> +#endif
> +	uaccess_disable \tmp
>  	.endm

Same here. For the enable/restore cases, the exception return will
synchronise the DACR for us, but I think we need the ISB to be sure that
the change has taken effect on the exception entry paths.

Will

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-08-25 14:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-18 21:42 Prevent list poison values from being mapped by userspace processes Jeffrey Vander Stoep
2015-08-21 13:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-08-21 13:31   ` [PATCH 1/9] ARM: domains: switch to keeping domain value in register Russell King
2015-08-21 13:31   ` [PATCH 2/9] ARM: domains: provide domain_mask() Russell King
2015-08-21 13:31   ` [PATCH 3/9] ARM: domains: move initial domain setting value to asm/domains.h Russell King
2015-08-21 13:31   ` [PATCH 4/9] ARM: domains: get rid of manager mode for user domain Russell King
2015-08-21 13:31   ` [PATCH 5/9] ARM: domains: keep vectors in separate domain Russell King
2015-08-21 13:31   ` [PATCH 6/9] ARM: domains: remove DOMAIN_TABLE Russell King
2015-08-21 13:31   ` [PATCH 7/9] ARM: uaccess: provide uaccess_save_and_enable() and uaccess_restore() Russell King
2015-08-21 13:31   ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM: entry: provide uaccess assembly macro hooks Russell King
2015-08-27 21:40     ` Stephen Boyd
2015-08-21 13:31   ` [PATCH 9/9] ARM: software-based priviledged-no-access support Russell King
2015-08-25 10:32     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-08-25 10:44       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-08-25 11:21         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-08-25 12:38           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-08-25 12:47             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-08-25 13:55             ` Nicolas Schichan
2015-08-25 14:05     ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-08-21 13:46   ` [PATCH 0/4] Efficiency cleanups Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-08-21 13:48     ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: uaccess: simplify user access assembly Russell King
2015-08-21 13:48     ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: entry: get rid of asm_trace_hardirqs_on_cond Russell King
2015-08-21 13:48     ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: entry: efficiency cleanups Russell King
2015-08-21 13:48     ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: entry: ensure that IRQs are enabled when calling syscall_trace_exit() Russell King
2015-08-24 14:36     ` [PATCH 0/4] Efficiency cleanups Will Deacon
2015-08-24 15:00       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-08-21 17:32   ` Prevent list poison values from being mapped by userspace processes Catalin Marinas
2015-08-24 12:06     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-08-24 13:05   ` Nicolas Schichan
2015-08-25  8:15     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-08-25 13:17       ` Nicolas Schichan
2015-08-24 18:06   ` Kees Cook
2015-08-24 18:47     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-08-24 18:51       ` Kees Cook
2015-08-24 19:14         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-08-24 19:22           ` Kees Cook
2015-08-24 19:32             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-08-24 22:01               ` Kees Cook
2015-08-26 20:34                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150825140552.GH21300@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox