Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner for A83T support

From: [email-masked] (Maxime Ripard)
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 17:53:13 +0200

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:47:40PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Vishnu Patekar
> <[email-masked]> wrote:
> > Allwinner A83T is octa-core cortex-a7 based SoC.
> > It's clock control unit and prcm, pinmux are different from previous sun8i
> > series.
> > Its processor cores are arragned in two clusters 4 cores each,
> > similar to A80.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vishnu Patekar <[email-masked]>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.txt | 1 +
> >  arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c                     | 1 +
> >  drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c                   | 6 ++++++
> >  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.txt
> > index 67da205..cf5ed27 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.txt
> > @@ -11,4 +11,5 @@ using one of the following compatible strings:
> >    allwinner,sun8i-a23
> >    allwinner,sun8i-a33
> >    allwinner,sun8i-h3
> > +  allwinner,sun8i-a83t
> 
> Alphabetic order please.
> 
> >    allwinner,sun9i-a80
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c
> > index 65bab28..b04aefa 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c
> > @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ static const char * const sun8i_board_dt_compat[] = {
> >         "allwinner,sun8i-a23",
> >         "allwinner,sun8i-a33",
> >         "allwinner,sun8i-h3",
> > +       "allwinner,sun8i-a83t",
> 
> Same here.
> 
> >         NULL,
> >  };
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> > index 413070d..f216d5d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> > @@ -1212,6 +1212,12 @@ CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun6i_a31s_clk_init, "allwinner,sun6i-a31s", sun6i_init_clocks);
> >  CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun8i_a23_clk_init, "allwinner,sun8i-a23", sun6i_init_clocks);
> >  CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun8i_a33_clk_init, "allwinner,sun8i-a33", sun6i_init_clocks);
> >
> > +static void __init sun8ia83t_init_clocks(struct device_node *node)
> > +{
> > +       sunxi_init_clocks(NULL, 0);
> > +}
> > +CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun9i_a83t_clk_init, "allwinner,sun8i-a83t", sun8ia83t_init_clocks);
> 
> sun8i? Missing underscore too.
> 
> I think you should add this once you actually have clock support.
> Otherwise this call basically does nothing.

That's not true, it actually initializes most of the clocks in the
system.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150922/d21e6196/attachment.sig>