Subject: [PATCH 3/5] mtd: brcmnand: Optional DT flag to reset IPROC NAND controller

From: [email-masked] (Josh Cartwright)
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 16:54:59 -0500

On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 03:33:50AM +0000, Anup Patel wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli [mailto:f.fainelli at gmail.com]
> > On 06/10/15 15:25, Scott Branden wrote:
[..]
> > Then instead of adding a "reset flag" to Device Tree, another approach could be
> > to put the desired or currently configured exhaustive list of NAND timings in
> > Device Tree, and based on that you could have this:
> > 
> > - the NAND controller driver finds that these timings match the current
> > configuration, you are good to go
> > 
> > - the NAND controller drivers finds a difference in how current timings are
> > configured vs. desired timings, and issues a controller reset, prior to applying
> > new timing configuration
>
> To add to this ...
>
> The mechanism to reset is BRCM NAND controller is SOC specific so the
> SoC independent BRCM NAND driver (i.e. brcmnand.c) does not know how
> to reset the NAND controller.
>
> For iProc SoC family, the NAND controller reset is through IDM register
> space which is only iomap'ed by iproc_nand.c.
>
> We might end-up having one more SoC specific callback which will be
> Provided by iproc_nand.c to brcmnand.c.

Not that I'm familiar with these SoCs, but I did want to chime in and
make sure you are aware of the existing reset_controller_dev
abstraction, which is intended to solve exactly this problem.  Including
a reset_control_get_optional() that might fit your use case.  See
include/linux/reset{,-controller}.h.

  Josh
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20151012/7129e0db/attachment.sig>