public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons•com (Thomas Petazzoni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/5] mtd: pxa3xx_nand: rework the timing setup
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:42:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151022174244.61eaf79e@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAEAJfCmo5u6=5GN6+k8GsFhC0dg477gVYY+t77uODP-PgWLGw@mail.gmail.com>

Dear Ezequiel Garcia,

On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:22:24 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:

> Could you compare NAND throughput using keep-config (keeping
> the bootloader timings) and without keep-config (with ONFI timings) ?

Seems like we are within the measurement noise. I did each test only
once, and the test lasts only a few seconds, but here are the results:

Without keep-config (i.e ONFI timings) :

# time dd if=/dev/mtd3 of=/dev/null bs=1M
32+0 records in
32+0 records out
real	0m 3.54s
user	0m 0.00s
sys	0m 0.26s

With keep-config (i.e bootloader timings)

# time dd if=/dev/mtd3 of=/dev/null bs=1M
32+0 records in
32+0 records out
real	0m 3.77s
user	0m 0.00s
sys	0m 0.21s

I.e we are apparently slightly faster with the ONFI timings. However
again, the test duration is very short, and I didn't repeat the test
several times.

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-22 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-21  8:28 [PATCH v4 0/5] mtd: pxa3xx_nand: rework the timing setup Antoine Tenart
2015-10-21  8:29 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] mtd: pxa3xx: prepare allowing compile test Antoine Tenart
2015-10-21  8:29 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] mtd: nand: allow compile test of MTD_NAND_PXA3xx Antoine Tenart
2015-10-26 18:34   ` Brian Norris
2015-10-21  8:29 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] mtd: pxa3xx_nand: add helpers to setup the timings Antoine Tenart
2015-10-21  8:29 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] mtd: pxa3xx_nand: rework flash detection and timing setup Antoine Tenart
2015-10-21  8:29 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] mtd: pxa3xx_nand: clean up the pxa3xx timings Antoine Tenart
2015-10-22 15:12 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] mtd: pxa3xx_nand: rework the timing setup Thomas Petazzoni
2015-10-22 15:22   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2015-10-22 15:42     ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2015-11-02 15:49   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2015-10-25 20:53 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-10-26 13:50 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2015-10-26 18:38   ` Brian Norris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151022174244.61eaf79e@free-electrons.com \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox