Subject: [PATCH 5/5] arm: boot: store ATAGs structure into DT "/chosen/linux,atags" entry

From: [email-masked] (Pavel Machek)
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 07:51:46 +0100

On Wed 2015-11-11 17:10:46, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Adding devicetree list.
> 
> Thread starts at
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-July/354459.html
> 
> On 11/5/2015 8:17 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Pali Roh?r <[email-masked]> [151105 03:41]:
> >> On Tuesday 13 October 2015 16:37:46 Pali Roh?r wrote:
> >>> On Monday 12 October 2015 13:45:09 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >>>> * Pali Roh?r <[email-masked]> [151012 13:29]:
> >>>>> On Monday 12 October 2015 22:16:40 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Pali, any news on posting an updated series with the comments
> >>>>>> addressed in this thread? It seems that we all pretty much agree
> >>>>>> what needs to be done.
> 
> I'm not real happy with the concept of patches 4 and 5 in this series.
> My concern is that those two patches are using the FDT as a transport
> mechanism for a binary blob (the atags object).

Umm. Ok. Do you have alternative proposal that works for everyone?

I mean. This discussion was going for quite a long time, and it would
be nice to have some solution... patch proposal... something.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html