Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: dts: DRA7: Add timer12 node

From: [email-masked] (Tony Lindgren)
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:58:50 -0800

* Suman Anna <[email-masked]> [151006 09:06]:
> On 10/06/2015 02:52 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Felipe Balbi <[email-masked]> [151005 17:51]:
> >>
> >> according to Tony we should avoid using status at all for in-SoC
> >> devices.
> >>
> >> Tony, can you confirm I understood you correctly ?
> > 
> > Yes. With status = "disabled" kernel completely ignores the
> > device and struct device is not created at all even with the
> > device being there. In general we're better off trying to
> > probe the device and idle it.
> > 
> > The only time we really want to mark something with
> > status = "disabled" is if some coprocessor firmware is
> > using that device and the kernel should not touch it at
> > all.
> 
> Not always, since some of the PM clocking logic depends on the state
> machine variables within the kernel.
> 
> We are also using this to deal with paper-spins (atleast in the DRA7
> case) and the DTS include model, wherein certain instances may not be
> present on all variations of the SoC, and enabled specifically on the
> instances that matter. Obviously, it could be done the other way too,
> but as far as what Nishanth mentioned sometime back, we are following
> the former for DRA7.
> 
> In anycase, the status property on the Timer12 node can be removed, it
> doesn't fall into the above category, and we are fixing it up properly
> on HS devices in the kernel.

Yeah please remove the status property, that can be set to disabled
in the HS board specific file.

Applying the first two patches into omap-for-v4.5/soc thanks.

Tony