From: jolsa@redhat•com (Jiri Olsa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] arm64: perf test: Improbe bp_signal
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:00:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160105090030.GC2192@krava.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1451969880-14877-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 04:58:00AM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:
SNIP
> + * - SIGUSR1 is delivered -> overflows_2 == 1 (nested signal)
> + * - sig_handler_2 return
> + * - sig_handler return
> + * - fd3 event watchpoint hit -> count3 == 1 (wp and bp in one insn)
> + * - SIGIO is delivered -> overflows == 2
> + * - fd2 event breakpoint hit -> count2 == 2
> + * - SIGUSR1 is delivered -> overflows_2 == 2
> + * - sig_handler_2 return
> + * - sig_handler return
> + * - fd3 event watchpoint hit -> count3 == 2 (standalone wp)
> + * - SIGIO is delivered -> overflows = 3
> + * - fd2 event breakpoint hit -> count2 == 3
> + * - SIGUSR1 is delivered -> overflows_2 == 3
> + * - sig_handler_2 return
> + * - sig_handler return
> *
> * The test case check following error conditions:
> * - we get stuck in signal handler because of debug
> @@ -152,11 +229,13 @@ int test__bp_signal(int subtest __maybe_unused)
> *
> */
>
> - fd1 = bp_event(test_function, 1);
> - fd2 = bp_event(sig_handler, 0);
> + fd1 = bp_event(__test_function, 1);
> + fd2 = __xp_event(true, sig_handler, 1, SIGUSR1);
> + fd3 = wp_event((void *)&the_var, 1);
>
spent some time to figure this out.. would attached change be more readable?
thanks,
jirka
---
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
index 0bc4f76c22ca..e5349616ac3f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static void sig_handler(int signum __maybe_unused,
}
}
-static int __xp_event(bool is_bp, void *addr, int setup_signal, int signal)
+static int __event(bool is_x, void *addr, int signal)
{
struct perf_event_attr pe;
int fd;
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static int __xp_event(bool is_bp, void *addr, int setup_signal, int signal)
pe.size = sizeof(struct perf_event_attr);
pe.config = 0;
- pe.bp_type = is_bp ? HW_BREAKPOINT_X : HW_BREAKPOINT_W;
+ pe.bp_type = is_x ? HW_BREAKPOINT_X : HW_BREAKPOINT_W;
pe.bp_addr = (unsigned long) addr;
pe.bp_len = sizeof(long);
@@ -128,25 +128,23 @@ static int __xp_event(bool is_bp, void *addr, int setup_signal, int signal)
return TEST_FAIL;
}
- if (setup_signal) {
- fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_ASYNC);
- fcntl(fd, F_SETSIG, signal);
- fcntl(fd, F_SETOWN, getpid());
- }
+ fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK|O_ASYNC);
+ fcntl(fd, F_SETSIG, signal);
+ fcntl(fd, F_SETOWN, getpid());
ioctl(fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_RESET, 0);
return fd;
}
-static int bp_event(void *addr, int setup_signal)
+static int bp_event(void *addr, int signal)
{
- return __xp_event(true, addr, setup_signal, SIGIO);
+ return __event(true, addr, signal);
}
-static int wp_event(void *addr, int setup_signal)
+static int wp_event(void *addr, int signal)
{
- return __xp_event(false, addr, setup_signal, SIGIO);
+ return __event(false, addr, signal);
}
static long long bp_count(int fd)
@@ -229,9 +227,9 @@ int test__bp_signal(int subtest __maybe_unused)
*
*/
- fd1 = bp_event(__test_function, 1);
- fd2 = __xp_event(true, sig_handler, 1, SIGUSR1);
- fd3 = wp_event((void *)&the_var, 1);
+ fd1 = bp_event(__test_function, SIGIO);
+ fd2 = bp_event(sig_handler, SIGUSR1);
+ fd3 = wp_event((void *)&the_var, SIGIO);
ioctl(fd1, PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE, 0);
ioctl(fd2, PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE, 0);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-05 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-23 8:52 [RESEND PATCH] arm64: Store breakpoint single step state into pstate Wang Nan
2015-12-23 10:44 ` kbuild test robot
2015-12-24 1:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Wang Nan
2016-01-04 16:55 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-05 1:41 ` Wangnan (F)
2016-01-05 4:58 ` [RFC PATCH] arm64: perf test: Improbe bp_signal Wang Nan
2016-01-05 5:09 ` Wangnan (F)
2016-01-05 8:53 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-01-05 9:00 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2016-01-05 9:05 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-01-05 9:09 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-01-05 5:06 ` [PATCH v2] arm64: Store breakpoint single step state into pstate Wangnan (F)
2016-01-12 17:06 ` Will Deacon
2016-01-15 8:20 ` xiakaixu
2016-01-21 8:06 ` xiakaixu
2016-01-18 11:39 ` Wangnan (F)
2016-01-05 9:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2] perf test: Improve bp_signal Wang Nan
2016-01-05 10:07 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160105090030.GC2192@krava.brq.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox