Subject: [linux-sunxi][PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: dts: sun7i: Add Itead Ibox support

From: [email-masked] (Maxime Ripard)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:54:08 +0100

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 08:43:34AM +0100, Code Kipper wrote:
> >> +&spi0 {
> >> +     pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> +     pinctrl-0 = <&spi0_pins_a>,
> >> +                 <&spi0_cs0_pins_a>;
> >> +     status = "okay";
> >
> > What device is connected to that bus?
>
> These lead out to the header on the side of the box and is also
> enabled in the fex. If we remove this we might as well remove sata as
> that is also done via this header.

AFAIK, the SATA is not muxable, so the pins on this header can only be
used for that anyway.

What I'm more concerned about is pins that are just "generic" pins
that can have multiple functions that are not really enforced by any
design choice.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160121/16db483f/attachment.sig>