Subject: [PATCH 1/3] arm64: efistub: drop __init annotation from handle_kernel_image()

From: [email-masked] (Matt Fleming)
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 16:00:06 +0000

On Fri, 29 Jan, at 10:36:03AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 28 January 2016 at 23:58, Matt Fleming <[email-masked]> wrote:
> >
> > Would it make more sense to #undef __init in one of the arm64 efistub
> > header files? I'm thinking of the case where some poor unsuspecting
> > developer writes a new function and marks it as __init, and we miss it
> > during review.
> >
> 
> Yes, I can add it to efistub.h, and make sure it gets included in all the files
> 
> Should we #undef it and #define it to a string that is easily grep'ed
> for, so it is easy to find the explanatory comment that goes along
> with it?
> E.g.,
> 
> #define __init __init_not_supported_in_efi_stub

This would produce a compilation failure if someone tags something as
__init right? Looks fine to me.