Subject: [PATCH v3 1/5] clk: sunxi: Add apb0 gates for H3

From: [email-masked] (Maxime Ripard)
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:11:52 +0100

Hi,

On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:47:52PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Thu,  4 Feb 2016 00:33:46 +0100
> Krzysztof Adamski <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> > This patch adds support for APB0 in H3. It seems to be compatible with
> > earlier SOCs. apb0 gates controls R_ block peripherals (R_PIO, R_IR,
> > etc).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Adamski <[email-masked]>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt | 1 +
> >  drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-simple-gates.c              | 2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
> > index e59f57b..751c8b9f0 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
> > @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ Required properties:
> >  	"allwinner,sun6i-a31-apb0-gates-clk" - for the APB0 gates on A31
> >  	"allwinner,sun7i-a20-apb0-gates-clk" - for the APB0 gates on A20
> >  	"allwinner,sun8i-a23-apb0-gates-clk" - for the APB0 gates on A23
> > +	"allwinner,sun8i-h3-apb0-gates-clk" - for the APB0 gates on H3
> >  	"allwinner,sun9i-a80-apb0-gates-clk" - for the APB0 gates on A80
> >  	"allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb1-clk" - for the APB1 clock
> >  	"allwinner,sun9i-a80-apb1-clk" - for the APB1 bus clock on A80
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-simple-gates.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-simple-gates.c
> > index f4da52b..6753c87 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-simple-gates.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-simple-gates.c
> > @@ -130,6 +130,8 @@ CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun8i_a23_apb2, "allwinner,sun8i-a23-apb2-gates-clk",
> >  	       sunxi_simple_gates_init);
> >  CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun8i_a33_ahb1, "allwinner,sun8i-a33-ahb1-gates-clk",
> >  	       sunxi_simple_gates_init);
> > +CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun8i_h3_apb0, "allwinner,sun8i-h3-apb0-gates-clk",
> > +	       sunxi_simple_gates_init);
> >  CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun9i_a80_ahb0, "allwinner,sun9i-a80-ahb0-gates-clk",
> >  	       sunxi_simple_gates_init);
> >  CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun9i_a80_ahb1, "allwinner,sun9i-a80-ahb1-gates-clk",
> 
> It seems that the other compatible strings are there for historical
> reasons. Why do you need a new one with such a specific name?
> 
> It would have been more sensible to add a generic compatible string as
> "allwinner,apb-gates", letting the removal of the other strings for a
> later patch...

Yeah, it's a good idea, and it's probably time that we move to that.

However, I'd like to keep per-soc and per-clocks compatibles in the
DT, in case we need to protect a clock in the future. That doesn't
prevent to have two compatibles thoughe, the specific and the generic.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160205/accd1c27/attachment.sig>