Subject: [PATCH] PCI: layerscape: add ls2085a compatible

From: [email-masked] (Bjorn Helgaas)
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 16:25:25 -0600

On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 12:45:25PM -0800, Shi, Yang wrote:
> On 2/5/2016 12:38 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >[+cc Rob, et al]
> >
> >On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 09:32:05AM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> >>The layerscape PCI host driver needs recognize ls2085a compatible when using
> >>firmware with ls2085a compatible property, otherwise the PCI bus won't be
> >>detected even though ls2085a compatible is included by the dts.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <[email-masked]>
> >>---
> >>  drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c | 1 +
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c
> >>index 3923bed..c40d8b2 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c
> >>+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c
> >>@@ -203,6 +203,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_of_match[] = {
> >>  	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-pcie", .data = &ls1021_drvdata },
> >>  	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1043a-pcie", .data = &ls1043_drvdata },
> >>  	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls2080a-pcie", .data = &ls2080_drvdata },
> >>+	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls2085a-pcie", .data = &ls2080_drvdata },
> >
> >Hmm, "fsl,ls2085a-pcie" doesn't appear in
> >Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/.
> >
> >Aren't we supposed to add these strings to the bindings before or at
> >the same time we add them to drivers?
> 
> The below patch will add it into dts and binding doc. I should
> mentioned this in the commit log.
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7767061/

OK.  This is really annoying as a reviewer.  To me, adding
"fsl,ls2085a-pcie" to:

  - the binding in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/layerscape-pci.txt
  - the DT in arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls2080a.dtsi
  - the driver in drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c

are all logically related, and it would make sense to have them all in
a single patch.

But whatever.  I applied this to pci/host-layerscape for v4.6.

> >checkpatch doesn't complain though, so maybe I'm wrong about this.
> >
> >>  	{ },
> >>  };
> >>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ls_pcie_of_match);
> >>--
> >>2.0.2
> >>
> >>--
> >>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> >>the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> >>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html