Subject: [PATCH 0/3] OMAP/pinmux: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag

From: [email-masked] (Tony Lindgren)
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 07:27:52 -0800

* Sudeep Holla <[email-masked]> [160215 02:03]:
> Hi Linus,
> 
> On 13/02/16 14:42, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Sudeep Holla <[email-masked]> wrote:
> >
> >>   pinctrl: single: Use a separate lockdep class
> >>   pinctrl: single: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
> >>   ARM: OMAP2+: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
> >>
> >>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux.c        |  4 ++--
> >>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c     |  9 ++++-----
> >>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c |  1 +
> >>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> >
> >Are these patches orthogonal so I can merge the pinctrl patch independently
> >of the OMAP patches if Tony ACKs this?
> >
> 
> Thanks for the follow up.
> IIUC they are dependent and remember Tony/Grygorii wanted them to be
> merged together(at-least for bisectibility)

AFAIK this series needs to be kept together to keep things
working.

> >If not: should it be merged by me or through ARM SoC/Tony?
> >
> 
> I think so.
> 
> >Anyways waiting for maintainer feedback, but the above is good to know.
> >
> 
> Grygorii was still not sure if this works and he couldn't give it a
> test. He was traveling and may need more time to get back on this.

He said it does not work so clearly more work is needed.

Regards,

Tony