public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: thierry.reding@gmail•com (Thierry Reding)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: allow child nodes inside the Tegra BPMP
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 16:08:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160728140847.GA28342@ulmo.ba.sec> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36967d69-cb2a-654e-9a4c-2021fd476464@wwwdotorg.org>

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 03:50:52PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/26/2016 10:21 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 07/26/2016 04:03 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:14:41PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > > > From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia•com>
> > > > 
> > > > The BPMP implements some services which must be represented by separate
> > > > nodes. For example, it can provide access to certain I2C controllers,
> > > > and
> > > > the I2C bindings represent each I2C controller as a device tree node.
> > > > Update the binding to describe how the BPMP supports this.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia•com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  .../bindings/firmware/nvidia,tegra186-bpmp.txt     | 23
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git
> > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/nvidia,tegra186-bpmp.txt
> > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/nvidia,tegra186-bpmp.txt
> > > > index 9a3864f56955..142d363406f6 100644
> > > > ---
> > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/nvidia,tegra186-bpmp.txt
> > > > +++
> > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/firmware/nvidia,tegra186-bpmp.txt
> > > > @@ -38,6 +38,24 @@ implemented by this node:
> > > >  - .../reset/reset.txt
> > > >  - <dt-bindings/reset/tegra186-reset.h>
> > > > 
> > > > +The BPMP implements some services which must be represented by
> > > > separate nodes.
> > > > +For example, it can provide access to certain I2C controllers, and
> > > > the I2C
> > > > +bindings represent each I2C controller as a device tree node. Such
> > > > nodes should
> > > > +be nested directly inside the main BPMP node.
> > > > +
> > > > +Software can determine whether a child node of the BPMP node
> > > > represents a device
> > > > +by checking for a compatible property. Any node with a compatible
> > > > property
> > > > +represents a device that can be instantiated. Nodes without a
> > > > compatible
> > > > +property may be used to provide configuration information regarding
> > > > the BPMP
> > > > +itself, although no such configuration nodes are currently defined
> > > > by this
> > > > +binding.
> > > > +
> > > > +The BPMP firmware defines no single global name-/numbering-space for
> > > > such
> > > > +services. Put another way, the numbering scheme for I2C buses is
> > > > distinct from
> > > > +the numbering scheme for any other service the BPMP may provide
> > > > (e.g. a future
> > > > +hypothetical SPI bus service). As such, child device nodes will have
> > > > no reg
> > > > +property, and the BPMP node will have no #address-cells or
> > > > #size-cells property.
> > > 
> > > My understanding is that the I2C bus number is passed as part of the
> > > request to the BPMP firmware. Does that not count as addressing? Could
> > > we not represent that generically using a device tree hierarchy? I'm
> > > thinking something along these lines:
> > > 
> > >     bpmp {
> > >         ...
> > > 
> > >         services {
> > >             i2c {
> > >                 i2c at 0 {
> > >                     reg = <0>;
> > 
> > Technically, that is possible. However, Rob Herring rejected the idea of
> > multiple levels of sub-nodes.
> > 
> > Can we please just go with what we have? DT bindings are frankly an
> > obstacle to getting anything done:-(
> 
> Thierry, any further thoughts here? I really need to get these DT bindings
> finalized so that I can use them in U-Boot, which is very urgent. Thanks.

If everyone else is fine with these bindings, let's go ahead with them.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160728/e2991667/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-28 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-19 19:14 [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: add power domains to Tegra BPMP firmware Stephen Warren
2016-07-19 19:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: allow child nodes inside the Tegra BPMP Stephen Warren
2016-07-20 13:16   ` Rob Herring
2016-07-20 15:57     ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-26  9:58   ` Jon Hunter
2016-07-26 10:03   ` Thierry Reding
2016-07-26 16:21     ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-27 21:50       ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-28 14:08         ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2016-07-28 19:07       ` Rob Herring
2016-07-28 21:24         ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-29 13:48           ` Thierry Reding
2016-07-29 16:06             ` Stephen Warren
2016-07-29 20:28               ` Rob Herring
2016-07-29 20:48                 ` Stephen Warren
2016-11-15 15:42   ` Thierry Reding
2016-07-19 19:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: add Tegra186 BPMP I2C binding Stephen Warren
2016-07-20 13:17   ` Rob Herring
2016-07-26 10:03   ` Jon Hunter
2016-07-26 16:24     ` Stephen Warren
2016-11-15 15:46   ` Thierry Reding
2016-07-20 12:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: add power domains to Tegra BPMP firmware Rob Herring
2016-07-26  9:55 ` Jon Hunter
2016-11-15 15:39 ` Thierry Reding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160728140847.GA28342@ulmo.ba.sec \
    --to=thierry.reding@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox