Subject: [PATCH v8 1/7] arm/arm64: vgic: Implement support for userspace access

From: [email-masked] (Christoffer Dall)
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 12:40:16 +0100

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 04:56:53PM +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Christoffer Dall
> <[email-masked]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 04:43:27PM +0530, vijay.kilari at gmail.com wrote:
> >> From: Vijaya Kumar K <[email-masked]>
> >>
> >> Read and write of some registers like ISPENDR and ICPENDR
> >> from userspace requires special handling when compared to
> >> guest access for these registers.
> >>
> >> Refer to Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-vgic-v3.txt
> >> for handling of ISPENDR, ICPENDR registers handling.
> >>
> >> Add infrastructure to support guest and userspace read
> >> and write for the required registers
> >> Also moved vgic_uaccess from vgic-mmio-v2.c to vgic-mmio.c
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K <[email-masked]>
> >> ---
> >>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c | 25 ----------
> >>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c    | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.h    | 19 ++++++++
> >>  4 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c
> >> index b44b359..0b32f40 100644
> >> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c
> >> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c
> >> @@ -406,31 +406,6 @@ int vgic_v2_has_attr_regs(struct kvm_device *dev, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> >>       return -ENXIO;
> >>  }
> >>
> >> -/*
> >> - * When userland tries to access the VGIC register handlers, we need to
> >> - * create a usable struct vgic_io_device to be passed to the handlers and we
> >> - * have to set up a buffer similar to what would have happened if a guest MMIO
> >> - * access occurred, including doing endian conversions on BE systems.
> >> - */
> >> -static int vgic_uaccess(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_io_device *dev,
> >> -                     bool is_write, int offset, u32 *val)
> >> -{
> >> -     unsigned int len = 4;
> >> -     u8 buf[4];
> >> -     int ret;
> >> -
> >> -     if (is_write) {
> >> -             vgic_data_host_to_mmio_bus(buf, len, *val);
> >> -             ret = kvm_io_gic_ops.write(vcpu, &dev->dev, offset, len, buf);
> >> -     } else {
> >> -             ret = kvm_io_gic_ops.read(vcpu, &dev->dev, offset, len, buf);
> >> -             if (!ret)
> >> -                     *val = vgic_data_mmio_bus_to_host(buf, len);
> >> -     }
> >> -
> >> -     return ret;
> >> -}
> >> -
> >>  int vgic_v2_cpuif_uaccess(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
> >>                         int offset, u32 *val)
> >>  {
> >> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> >> index 0d3c76a..ce2708d 100644
> >> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> >> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> >> @@ -209,6 +209,62 @@ static unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_v3_idregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >>       return 0;
> >>  }
> >>
> >> +static unsigned long vgic_v3_uaccess_read_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >> +                                               gpa_t addr, unsigned int len)
> >> +{
> >> +     u32 intid = VGIC_ADDR_TO_INTID(addr, 1);
> >> +     u32 value = 0;
> >> +     int i;
> >> +
> >> +     /*
> >> +      * A level triggerred interrupt pending state is latched in both
> >> +      * "soft_pending" and "line_level" variables. Userspace will save
> >> +      * and restore soft_pending and line_level separately.
> >> +      * Refer to Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/arm-vgic-v3.txt
> >> +      * handling of ISPENDR and ICPENDR.
> >> +      */
> >> +     for (i = 0; i < len * 8; i++) {
> >> +             struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, intid + i);
> >> +
> >> +             if (irq->config == VGIC_CONFIG_LEVEL && irq->soft_pending)
> >> +                     value |= (1U << i);
> >> +             if (irq->config == VGIC_CONFIG_EDGE && irq->pending)
> >> +                     value |= (1U << i);
> >> +
> >> +             vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
> >> +     }
> >> +
> >> +     return value;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void vgic_v3_uaccess_write_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >> +                                       gpa_t addr, unsigned int len,
> >> +                                       unsigned long val)
> >> +{
> >> +     u32 intid = VGIC_ADDR_TO_INTID(addr, 1);
> >> +     int i;
> >> +
> >> +     for (i = 0; i < len * 8; i++) {
> >> +             struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, intid + i);
> >> +
> >> +             spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
> >> +             if (test_bit(i, &val)) {
> >> +                     irq->pending = true;
> >> +                     irq->soft_pending = true;
> >
> > In the vgic_mmio_write_spending function we only set the soft_pending
> > state to true if the interrupt is a level-triggered interrupt.
> >
> > Should we check if that's the case here as well before setting the
> > soft_pending state?
> 
> Yes, can be done. But it puts hard requirement that irq config should
> be restored
> before updating pending state.

Ah, I see.

ok, I think you should keep it the way it is then, but please add a
comment to that effect.

> In any case, the soft_pending is used only if interrupt is level-triggered.
> 
Yes, indeed.

Thanks,
-Christoffer