Subject: [PATCH v33 07/14] arm64: hibernate: preserve kdump image around hibernation

From: [email-masked] (AKASHI Takahiro)
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 20:29:30 +0900

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:25:46PM +0000, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Akashi,
> 
> On 15/03/17 09:59, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > Since arch_kexec_protect_crashkres() removes a mapping for crash dump
> > kernel image, the loaded data won't be preserved around hibernation.
> > 
> > In this patch, helper functions, kexec_prepare_suspend()/
> > kexec_post_resume(), are additionally called before/after hibernation so
> > that the relevant memory segments will be mapped again and preserved just
> > as the others are.
> > 
> > In addition, to minimize the size of hibernation image,
> > kexec_is_chraskres_nosave() is added to pfn_is_nosave() in order to
> 
> (crashkres)

Yes.

> > recoginize only the pages that hold loaded crash dump kernel image as
> 
> (recognize)

Ah, yes ...

> > saveable. Hibernation excludes any pages that are marked as Reserved and
> > yet "nosave."
> 
> 
> Neat! I didn't think this would be possible without hacking kernel/power/snapshot.c.
> 
> I've given this a spin on Juno and Seattle, I even added debug_pagealloc, but
> that doesn't trick it because your kexec_prepare_suspend() puts the mapping back.
> 
> Reviewed-by: James Morse <[email-masked]>
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> James
> 
> 
> Some nits about comments:
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hibernate.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/hibernate.c
> > index 97a7384100f3..1e10fafa59bd 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hibernate.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hibernate.c
> > @@ -286,6 +288,9 @@ int swsusp_arch_suspend(void)
> >  	local_dbg_save(flags);
> >  
> >  	if (__cpu_suspend_enter(&state)) {
> > +		/* make the crash dump kernel image visible/saveable */
> > +		kexec_prepare_suspend();
> 
> Strictly this is kdump not kexec, but the comment makes that clear.

I hesitated to use "kdump_" here as there are no functions with
such a prefix (say, even arch_kexec_protect_crashkres()).
So probably "crash_" or "crash_kexec_" would sound much better.

> > +
> >  		sleep_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> >  		ret = swsusp_save();
> >  	} else {
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> > index 02e4f929db3b..82f48db589cf 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
> 
> > @@ -220,7 +221,6 @@ void arch_kexec_protect_crashkres(void)
> >  			kexec_crash_image->segment[i].memsz,
> >  			PAGE_KERNEL_INVALID, true);
> >  
> > -
> 
> Stray whitespace change from a previous patch?

Oops, fix it.

> >  	flush_tlb_all();
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -233,3 +233,74 @@ void arch_kexec_unprotect_crashkres(void)
> 
> > +/*
> > + * kexec_is_crashres_nosave
> > + *
> > + * Return true only if a page is part of reserved memory for crash dump kernel,
> > + * but does not hold any data of loaded kernel image.
> > + *
> > + * Note that all the pages in crash dump kernel memory have been initially
> > + * marked as Reserved in kexec_reserve_crashkres_pages().
> > + *
> > + * In hibernation, the pages which are Reserved and yet "nosave"
> > + * are excluded from the hibernation iamge. kexec_is_crashkres_nosave()
> > + * does this check for crash dump kernel and will reduce the total size
> > + * of hibernation image.
> > + */
> > +
> > +bool kexec_is_crashkres_nosave(unsigned long pfn)
> > +{
> > +	int i;
> > +	phys_addr_t addr;
> > +
> > +	/* in reserved memory? */
> 
> Comment in the wrong place?

This is after my deep thinking :) but

> 
> > +	if (!crashk_res.end)
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	addr = __pfn_to_phys(pfn);
> 
> (makes more sense here)

if you think so, I will follow you.

> 
> > +	if ((addr < crashk_res.start) || (crashk_res.end < addr))
> > +		return false;
> > +
> 
> > +	/* not part of loaded kernel image? */
> 
> Comment in the wrong place?
> 
> 
> > +	if (!kexec_crash_image)
> > +		return true;
> > +
> 
> (makes more sense here)

ditto

> 
> > +	for (i = 0; i < kexec_crash_image->nr_segments; i++)
> > +		if (addr >= kexec_crash_image->segment[i].mem &&
> > +				addr < (kexec_crash_image->segment[i].mem +
> > +					kexec_crash_image->segment[i].memsz))
> > +			return false;
> > +
> > +	return true;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> James

Thank you for your review!
-Takahiro AKASHI