From: andrew@lunn•ch (Andrew Lunn)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] mvebu: wrt1900ac: Use pwm-fan rather than gpio-fan
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:17:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170327131725.GA25549@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170326230558.6b6c4ec6@gmail.com>
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 11:05:58PM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 15:35:05 +0100
> Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn•ch> wrote:
>
> > > + pwm_fan {
> > > /* SUNON HA4010V4-0000-C99 */
> > > - compatible = "gpio-fan";
> > > - gpios = <&gpio0 24 0>;
> > >
> > > - gpio-fan,speed-map = <0 0
> > > - 4500 1>;
> > > + compatible = "pwm-fan";
> > > + pwms = <&gpio0 24 4000 0>;
> >
> > Hi Ralph
> >
> > I believe this last 0 is the flags parameter. Now that we have
> > #pwm-cells = 1, i think this last 0 should be dropped.
> >
> > Andrew
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> isn't the 4000 (period?) pwm-cell #2 and 0 (flags?) pwm-cell #3? I
> actually expect "pwms = <&gpio0 24>;" here or "#pwm-cells = <2>;"
Hi Ralph
>From Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.txt:
pwm-list ::= <single-pwm> [pwm-list]
single-pwm ::= <pwm-phandle> <pwm-specifier>
pwm-phandle : phandle to PWM controller node
pwm-specifier : array of #pwm-cells specifying the given PWM
(controller specific)
Our pwm-list has a single single-pwm.
phandle is &gpio0.
The remaining parts are the specifier, or which there should be #pwm-calls.
>From Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.txt again:
pwm-specifier typically encodes the chip-relative PWM number and the PWM
period in nanoseconds.
Optionally, the pwm-specifier can encode a number of flags (defined in
<dt-bindings/pwm/pwm.h>) in a third cell:
- PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED: invert the PWM signal polarity
So we are using the 24th PWM and 4000 nanosecod period. We don't want
any flags.
So
pwms = <&gpio0 24 4000>;
has a phandle, and then 2 cells.
Andrew
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-27 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-24 14:18 [PATCH v3 0/4] gpio: mvebu: Add PWM fan support Ralph Sennhauser
2017-03-24 14:18 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] gpio: mvebu: Add limited PWM support Ralph Sennhauser
2017-03-24 14:23 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-03-24 14:28 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-03-24 14:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mvebu: xp: Add PWM properties to .dtsi files Ralph Sennhauser
2017-03-24 14:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] ARM: mvebu: Enable SENSORS_PWM_FAN in defconfig Ralph Sennhauser
2017-03-24 14:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] mvebu: wrt1900ac: Use pwm-fan rather than gpio-fan Ralph Sennhauser
2017-03-24 14:35 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-03-24 22:23 ` Ralph Sennhauser
2017-03-26 21:05 ` Ralph Sennhauser
2017-03-27 13:17 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170327131725.GA25549@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn$(echo .)ch \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox