Subject: [PATCH 2/5] pinctrl: imx: add soc specific mux_mode mask and shift property

From: [email-masked] (Shawn Guo)
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 16:52:37 +0800

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 08:38:02PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> MX7ULP MUX mode mask and shift bit is different from VF610.
> Let's make it a platform specific property for the later easy of
> adding MX7ULP support.
> 
> Cc: Linus Walleij <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Stefan Agner <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Bai Ping <[email-masked]>
> Signed-off-by: Fugang Duan <[email-masked]>
> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.c   | 10 +++++-----
>  drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.h   |  4 ++++
>  drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-vf610.c |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.c
> index db76e9d..8347197 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.c
> @@ -197,8 +197,8 @@ static int imx_pmx_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned selector,
>  		if (info->flags & SHARE_MUX_CONF_REG) {
>  			u32 reg;
>  			reg = readl(ipctl->base + pin_reg->mux_reg);
> -			reg &= ~(0x7 << 20);
> -			reg |= (pin->mux_mode << 20);
> +			reg &= ~info->mux_mask;
> +			reg |= (pin->mux_mode << info->mux_shift);
>  			writel(reg, ipctl->base + pin_reg->mux_reg);
>  		} else {
>  			writel(pin->mux_mode, ipctl->base + pin_reg->mux_reg);
> @@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ static int imx_pmx_gpio_request_enable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>  
>  mux_pin:
>  	reg = readl(ipctl->base + pin_reg->mux_reg);
> -	reg &= ~(0x7 << 20);
> +	reg &= ~info->mux_mask;
>  	reg |= imx_pin->config;
>  	writel(reg, ipctl->base + pin_reg->mux_reg);
>  
> @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ static int imx_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>  	*config = readl(ipctl->base + pin_reg->conf_reg);
>  
>  	if (info->flags & SHARE_MUX_CONF_REG)
> -		*config &= 0xffff;
> +		*config &= ~info->mux_mask;

It changes the way how code works.  We need a note in the commit log
explaining why it's safe.

Shawn

>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ static int imx_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>  		if (info->flags & SHARE_MUX_CONF_REG) {
>  			u32 reg;
>  			reg = readl(ipctl->base + pin_reg->conf_reg);
> -			reg &= ~0xffff;
> +			reg &= info->mux_mask;
>  			reg |= configs[i];
>  			writel(reg, ipctl->base + pin_reg->conf_reg);
>  		} else {
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.h b/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.h
> index b5c8fe1..eb0ce95 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,10 @@ struct imx_pinctrl_soc_info {
>  	const char *gpr_compatible;
>  	struct mutex mutex;
>  
> +	/* MUX_MODE shift and mask in case SHARE_MUX_CONF_REG */
> +	unsigned int mux_mask;
> +	u8 mux_shift;
> +
>  	/* generic pinconf */
>  	bool generic_pinconf;
>  	const struct pinconf_generic_params *custom_params;
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-vf610.c b/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-vf610.c
> index 2b1e198..3bd8556 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-vf610.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-vf610.c
> @@ -299,6 +299,8 @@ static struct imx_pinctrl_soc_info vf610_pinctrl_info = {
>  	.pins = vf610_pinctrl_pads,
>  	.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(vf610_pinctrl_pads),
>  	.flags = SHARE_MUX_CONF_REG | ZERO_OFFSET_VALID,
> +	.mux_mask = 0x700000,
> +	.mux_shift = 20,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id vf610_pinctrl_of_match[] = {
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel