public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mka@chromium•org (Matthias Kaehlcke)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] efi/libstub: arm64: set -fpie when building the EFI stub
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 12:44:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170608194436.GH141096@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu--WbvmS3EMPSD8sx6yVqgHQJO1r70+SYBRo_WZjUxioQ@mail.gmail.com>

El Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 07:18:36PM +0000 Ard Biesheuvel ha dit:

> On 8 June 2017 at 19:08, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium•org> wrote:
> > El Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:09:53AM +0100 Ard Biesheuvel ha dit:
> >
> >> Clang may emit absolute symbol references when building in non-PIC mode,
> >> even when using the default 'small' code model, which is already mostly
> >> position independent to begin with, due to its use of adrp/add pairs
> >> that have a relative range of +/- 4 GB. The remedy is to pass the -fpie
> >> flag, which can be done safely now that the code has been updated to avoid
> >> GOT indirections (which may be emitted due to the compiler assuming that
> >> the PIC/PIE code may end up in a shared library that is subject to ELF
> >> symbol preemption)
> >>
> >> Passing -fpie when building code that needs to execute at an a priori
> >> unknown offset is arguably an improvement in any case, and given that
> >> the recent visibility changes allow the PIC build to pass with GCC as
> >> well, let's add -fpie for all arm64 builds rather than only for Clang.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro•org>
> >
> > Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium•org>
> 
> Thanks Matthias.
> 
> For the record, did you test only with Clang?

With both gcc and clang. Booting has only been tested with an older
kernel (v3.18), I suppose it shouldn't make a difference.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-08 19:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-18  9:09 [PATCH 0/3] efi: arm64: use -fpie for building the stub Ard Biesheuvel
2017-05-18  9:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] efi/libstub: arm64: use hidden attribute for struct screen_info reference Ard Biesheuvel
2017-06-08 19:06   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2017-05-18  9:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] efi/libstub: arm64: force 'hidden' visibility for section markers Ard Biesheuvel
2017-06-08 19:07   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2017-05-18  9:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] efi/libstub: arm64: set -fpie when building the EFI stub Ard Biesheuvel
2017-06-08 19:08   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2017-06-08 19:18     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-06-08 19:44       ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2017-06-09  9:02 ` [PATCH 0/3] efi: arm64: use -fpie for building the stub Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170608194436.GH141096@google.com \
    --to=mka@chromium$(echo .)org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox