Subject: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: dts: imx28-tx28: fix interrupt flags and use interrupts-extended property

From: [email-masked] (Shawn Guo)
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:13:32 +0800

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:56:32AM +0200, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:17:26 +0200 Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 01:05:38PM +0200, Lothar Wa?mann wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-tx28.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-tx28.dts
> > > index 211e67d..3c852f7 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-tx28.dts
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-tx28.dts
> > > @@ -328,8 +328,7 @@
> > >  		reg = <0x20>;
> > >  		pinctrl-names = "default";
> > >  		pinctrl-0 = <&tx28_pca9554_pins>;
> > > -		interrupt-parent = <&gpio3>;
> > > -		interrupts = <28 0>;
> > > +		interrupts-extended = <&gpio3 28 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
> > >  		gpio-controller;
> > >  		#gpio-cells = <2>;
> > >  		interrupt-controller;
> > 
> > While interrupts-extended looks nice,
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt
> > has:
> > 
> > 	"interrupts-extended" should only be used when a device has
> > 	multiple interrupt parents.
> > 
> > If this is still true, this patch is wrong.
> >
> Thanks for the hint. It really helps to read the documentation
> sometimes, rahter than relying on existing code only...
> 
> A quick check shows, that more than 100 of the 130 uses of
> interrupts-extended are wrong. :(

So should I drop all interrupts-extended patches from you?

Shawn