Subject: [PATCH] drivers/firmware: psci: Convert timers to use timer_setup()

From: [email-masked] (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:52:58 +0100

Hi Kees,

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 03:13:31AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.

> Also adds missing call to destroy_timer_on_stack().

This patch should be split I think. I can send a patch to add
the missing destroy_timer_on_stack() call (which may get in
as a fix) and then we add a patch to update the timer setup
API.

> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email-masked]>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/psci_checker.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci_checker.c b/drivers/firmware/psci_checker.c
> index 6523ce962865..f3f4f810e5df 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/psci_checker.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci_checker.c
> @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static int hotplug_tests(void)
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> -static void dummy_callback(unsigned long ignored) {}
> +static void dummy_callback(struct timer_list *unused) {}
>  
>  static int suspend_cpu(int index, bool broadcast)
>  {
> @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int suspend_test_thread(void *arg)
>  	pr_info("CPU %d entering suspend cycles, states 1 through %d\n",
>  		cpu, drv->state_count - 1);
>  
> -	setup_timer_on_stack(&wakeup_timer, dummy_callback, 0);
> +	timer_setup_on_stack(&wakeup_timer, dummy_callback, 0);

drivers/firmware/psci_checker.c: In function 'suspend_test_thread':
drivers/firmware/psci_checker.c:290:2: error: implicit declaration of
function 'timer_setup_on_stack' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  timer_setup_on_stack(&wakeup_timer, dummy_callback, 0);
    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

On which tree this change is based on ?

I will send out the fix separately and CC you in.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

>  	for (i = 0; i < NUM_SUSPEND_CYCLE; ++i) {
>  		int index;
>  		/*
> @@ -340,6 +340,7 @@ static int suspend_test_thread(void *arg)
>  	 * later.
>  	 */
>  	del_timer(&wakeup_timer);
> +	destroy_timer_on_stack(&wakeup_timer);
>  
>  	if (atomic_dec_return_relaxed(&nb_active_threads) == 0)
>  		complete(&suspend_threads_done);
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> 
> -- 
> Kees Cook
> Pixel Security