public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm•com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: Page fault while link_path_walk for path_len > 4060 bytes
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 01:19:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171107011902.GB13514@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171104001757.GM21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 12:17:57AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> [looking through the old mail]
> 
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 09:26:16PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > -    { do_page_fault,    SIGSEGV, SEGV_MAPERR,    "level 3 translation
> > > fault"    },
> > > +    { do_translation_fault,    SIGSEGV, SEGV_MAPERR,    "level 3
> > > translation fault"    },
> > > we will try with above changes and get back to you.
> > 
> > Did you test with this change?
> 
> FWIW, while that went in as commit 760bfb47c36a ("arm64: fault: Route pte
> translation faults via do_translation_fault"), I wonder if the same issue
> exists on arm.  It looks like the pagefault handler there is fairly
> similar to arm64 one and the same shortcut is present there.

So we never actually nailed this one down on arm64 (the problem mysteriously
disappeared iirc, and I failed to reproduce it on my systems) but I fixed it
anyway because it looked at least theoretically possible. In that case, yes,
I think ARM needs the same sort of fixes for both 2 and 3 level tables where
the handler branch directly to do_page_fault.

> The more I'm looking at that, the more it looks like we *really* need
> a comment in all instances of load_unaligned_zeropad() warning about
> that pitfall.  Something like
> /*
>  * Load an unaligned word from kernel space.
>  *
>  * In the (very unlikely) case of the word being a page-crosser
>  * and the next page not being mapped, take the exception and
>  * return zeroes in the non-existing part.
>  *
>  * NOTE: this relies upon the pagefault handler *NOT* blocking
>  * in such situation (fault in kernel mode on kernel address with
>  * exception fixup present).  Verify that for your architecture
>  * before using an equivalent of this approach.  Note that
>  * you can't count upon faulthandler_disabled() saving you;
>  * this function can be called e.g. under a spinlock on non-preempt
>  * kernels without pagefault_disable() done by caller.
>  */
> perhaps.  That property holds on x86, ppc and (now) arm64, but as
> arm64 case shows, it might not be true for other architectures.
> As the matter of fact, e.g. sparc64 (which will not use that
> thing for obvious reasons anyway) it is *not* true, etc.

I wonder if there's any mileage in a test module for this? That code rarely
(if ever) gets run in practice.

Will

      reply	other threads:[~2017-11-07  1:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <08e7e3332dc86c535dd2961ac1cde0b5@codeaurora.org>
     [not found] ` <54083a824d6705a93d972ca5ef3a7b35@codeaurora.org>
     [not found]   ` <3958983ccec4aca494bf72c397f34bfa@codeaurora.org>
     [not found]     ` <953068e79da559bfd4f13e46e31c5a4e@codeaurora.org>
2017-08-22 12:57       ` Page fault while link_path_walk for path_len > 4060 bytes Will Deacon
     [not found]         ` <b13b3a27e92c5413d168ad775163ea91@codeaurora.org>
2017-08-28  6:20           ` Al Viro
     [not found]             ` <c4256a77288fd5f275a45bc73c9c78f0@codeaurora.org>
2017-09-11  3:14               ` ankijain at codeaurora.org
2017-09-12 20:26           ` Will Deacon
2017-09-13 17:05             ` ankijain at codeaurora.org
2017-09-26 17:36               ` ankijain at codeaurora.org
2017-11-04  0:17             ` Al Viro
2017-11-07  1:19               ` Will Deacon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171107011902.GB13514@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox