public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm•com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] arm64/kernel: get rid of GCC large model code
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 17:40:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180305174057.GC13385@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180214113645.16793-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:36:42AM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> I am resending this as an RFC, because I'd like to understand whether
> anyone else shares my concern, or whether I am being overly paranoid.
> 
> v2 blurb:
> 
> GCC's large model uses literal pools to emit cross object symbol
> references rather than movz/movk sequences, resulting in data items
> mixed in the with executable code in modules' .text segments, reducing
> cache utilization, but also potentially resulting in the creation of
> code gadgets that are exploitable under speculative execution.
> 
> We are using GCC's large model for two separate reasons, both of which can
> be worked around rather easily:
> - KASLR uses it to move modules and the kernel very far apart, which is
>   not really needed,
> - the Cortex-A53 erratum code uses it to avoid ADRP instruction altogether,
>   which can be replaced by selective patching of only the ADRP instructions
>   that are affected by the erratum

I think this is a sensible thing to do, cheers.

Will

      parent reply	other threads:[~2018-03-05 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-14 11:36 [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] arm64/kernel: get rid of GCC large model code Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-14 11:36 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] arm64/kernel: kaslr: reduce module randomization range to 4 GB Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-23 17:00   ` Mark Rutland
2018-02-23 17:07     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-03-05 12:22       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-14 11:36 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] arm64/kernel: don't ban ADRP to work around Cortex-A53 erratum #843419 Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-23 17:15   ` Mark Rutland
2018-02-23 17:17     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-23 17:25       ` Mark Rutland
2018-02-24 17:54         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-26 10:53           ` Mark Rutland
2018-03-05 17:18   ` Will Deacon
2018-03-05 17:26     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-03-05 17:34       ` Will Deacon
2018-03-05 17:41         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-03-05 17:42           ` Will Deacon
2018-02-14 11:36 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/3] arm64/kernel: enable A53 erratum #8434319 handling at runtime Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-23 17:23   ` Mark Rutland
2018-03-05 17:22   ` Will Deacon
2018-03-05 17:29     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-03-05 17:40       ` Will Deacon
2018-03-05 18:01         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-03-06 15:25           ` Will Deacon
2018-03-05 17:40 ` Will Deacon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180305174057.GC13385@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox