Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: reset: Add document for Broadcom STB reset controller

From: Rob Herring <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 11:41:17 -0600

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 05:34:08PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Add a binding document for the Broadcom STB reset controller, also known
> as SW_INIT-style reset controller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/reset/brcm,reset.txt  | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/brcm,reset.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/brcm,reset.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/brcm,reset.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6e5341b4f891
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/brcm,reset.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +Broadcom STB SW_INIT-style reset controller
> +===========================================
> +
> +Broadcom STB SoCs have a SW_INIT-style reset controller with separate
> +SET/CLEAR/STATUS registers and possibly multiple banks, each of 32 bit
> +reset lines.
> +
> +Please also refer to reset.txt in this directory for common reset
> +controller binding usage.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: should be brcm,brcmstb-reset
> +- reg: register base and length
> +- #reset-cells: must be set to 1
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +	reset: reset-controller@8404318 {
> +		compatible = "brcm,brcmstb-reset";
> +		reg = <0x8404318 0x30>;

Based on this address, should this be a sub-node of something else? Or 
not even a sub-node and just make the parent be a reset provider?

Rob

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel