Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] spi-atmel: support inter-word delay

From: Alexandre Belloni <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 16:05:49 +0100

Hi,

On 29/01/2019 15:56:31+0100, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> On 29/01/2019 15:27, [email-masked] wrote:
> > On 29/01/2019 at 09:38, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> > > 
> > > +	/* DLYBCT adds delays between words.  This is useful for slow devices
> > > +	 * that need a bit of time to setup the next transfer.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	if (spi->word_delay_us) {
> > 
> > Well...
> > 
> > > +		csr |= SPI_BF(DLYBCT,
> > > +			clamp_t(u8,
> > > +				(as->spi_clk/1000000*spi->word_delay_us)>>5,
> > > +				1, 255));
> > 
> > ... why not simplifying to:
> > +				0, 255));
> > and remove the test altogether, after all?
> 
> Hmm... that seemed too easy!  This started out as something else and looking
> at it now I think even the clamp_t() is unnecessary.  The value is already
> 0-255 and the way SPI_BF works any overflow is already truncated...  I'll
> rework this and resubmit once I get some feedback on the word_delay_us bits.
> 

While at it, note that you need to add spaces around the operators.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel