Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Actions ARM64 DT updates for v5.1

From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 15:03:14 +0530

Hi Arnd,

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 04:37:58PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 2:50 PM Manivannan Sadhasivam
> <[email-masked]> wrote:
> > ---
> > The following changes since commit bfeffd155283772bbe78c6a05dec7c0128ee500c:
> >
> >   Linux 5.0-rc1 (2019-01-06 17:08:20 -0800)
> >
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> >
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mani/linux-actions.git tags/actions-arm64-dt-for-v5.1
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to 9175a8116f452a515cea734c6fedee6788e6bc33:
> >
> >   arm64: dts: actions: s700-cubieboard7: Enable I2C0 and I2C1 (2019-02-16 11:32:46 +0530)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Actions ARM64 DT changes for v5.1:
> >
> > - Add interrupt properties to S900 pinctrl node
> > - Add Reset controller support for S700
> > - Add Reset controller support for S900
> > - Add pinctrl support for S700
> > - Add I2C support for S700
> > - Enable I2C0 and I2C1 for s700-cubieboard7
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Manivannan Sadhasivam (3):
> >       arm64: dts: actions: Add interrupt properties to pinctrl node for S900
> >       arm64: dts: actions: Add Reset Controller support for S700 SoC
> >       arm64: dts: actions: Add Reset Controller support for S900 SoC
> >
> > Parthiban Nallathambi (2):
> >       arm64: dts: actions: s700: Add I2C controller nodes
> >       arm64: dts: actions: s700-cubieboard7: Enable I2C0 and I2C1
> >
> > Saravanan Sekar (1):
> >       arm64: dts: actions: Add pinctrl node for Actions Semi S700
> 
> Pulled into arm/dt, but please try to improve the tag description for
> the next round: the text you have is more or less just a repeat
> of the one-line subjects of the individual patches.
> 
> Instead, what you want to do is give a high-level description of what
> is going on overall in your branch (e.g. adding multiple DT nodes for
> missing devices) and ideally some background (e.g. how much
> of the SoCs are actually described now, and how much is still
> missing here).
> 

Sorry for that. I will keep these in mind next time.

Thanks,
Mani

>        Arnd

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel