Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] binfmt_flat: remove flat_old_ram_flag

From: Christoph Hellwig <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:36:48 +0200

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 04:04:39PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> index c0e4535dc1ec..18d82fd5f57c 100644
>> --- a/fs/binfmt_flat.c
>> +++ b/fs/binfmt_flat.c
>> @@ -488,7 +488,8 @@ static int load_flat_file(struct linux_binprm *bprm,
>>   	 * fix up the flags for the older format,  there were all kinds
>>   	 * of endian hacks,  this only works for the simple cases
>>   	 */
>> -	if (rev == OLD_FLAT_VERSION && flat_old_ram_flag(flags))
>> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BINFMT_FLAT_OLD_ALWAYS_RAM) &&
>> +	    rev == OLD_FLAT_VERSION)
>
> The flags are from the binary file header here, so this is going to lose
> that check for most platforms (except h8300 where it would always have
> been true).

Indeed.  The old code is:

	if (rev == OLD_FLAT_VERSION && flat_old_ram_flag(flags))
		flags = FLAT_FLAG_RAM;

which for !h8300 evaluates to:

	if (rev == OLD_FLAT_VERSION && flags)
		flags = FLAT_FLAG_RAM;

so basically if any flag was set it was turned into FLAT_FLAG_RAM.
Was that really intentional?  I guess even if it wasn't the is no
point in changing this historic behavior now.

So I guess what we could do it something like:

	if (rev == OLD_FLAT_VERSION &&
	    (flags || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BINFMT_FLAT_OLD_ALWAYS_RAM)))
		flags = FLAT_FLAG_RAM;

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel