Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] KVM: arm64: Provide a PV_TIME device to user space

From: Marc Zyngier <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2019 18:34:20 +0100

On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 13:51:13 +0100
Marc Zyngier <[email-masked]> wrote:

[forgot that one]

> On Fri,  2 Aug 2019 15:50:14 +0100
> Steven Price <[email-masked]> wrote:

[...]

> > +static int __init kvm_pvtime_init(void)
> > +{
> > +	kvm_register_device_ops(&pvtime_ops, KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PV_TIME);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +late_initcall(kvm_pvtime_init);

Why is it an initcall? So far, the only initcall we've used is the one
that initializes KVM itself. Can't we just the device_ops just like we
do for the vgic?

	M.
-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel