Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Add tlb_sync implementation hook

From: Thierry Reding <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 13:14:46 +0200

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 03:47:03PM -0700, Krishna Reddy wrote:
> tlb_sync hook allows nvidia smmu handle tlb sync
> across multiple SMMUs as necessary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krishna Reddy <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c        |  8 +++++---
>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h        |  4 ++++
>  3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c
> index d93ceda..a429b2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-nvidia.c
> @@ -56,11 +56,43 @@ static void nsmmu_write_reg64(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
>  		writeq_relaxed(val, nsmmu_page(smmu, i, page) + offset);
>  }
>  
> +static void nsmmu_tlb_sync_wait(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
> +				int sync, int status, int inst)
> +{
> +	u32 reg;
> +	unsigned int spin_cnt, delay;
> +
> +	for (delay = 1; delay < TLB_LOOP_TIMEOUT; delay *= 2) {
> +		for (spin_cnt = TLB_SPIN_COUNT; spin_cnt > 0; spin_cnt--) {
> +			reg = readl_relaxed(
> +			      nsmmu_page(smmu, inst, page) + status);
> +			if (!(reg & sTLBGSTATUS_GSACTIVE))
> +				return;
> +			cpu_relax();
> +		}
> +		udelay(delay);
> +	}
> +	dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev,
> +			    "TLB sync timed out -- SMMU may be deadlocked\n");
> +}
> +
> +static void nsmmu_tlb_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
> +			   int sync, int status)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	arm_smmu_writel(smmu, page, sync, 0);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < to_nsmmu(smmu)->num_inst; i++)
> +		nsmmu_tlb_sync_wait(smmu, page, sync, status, i);
> +}
> +
>  static const struct arm_smmu_impl nsmmu_impl = {
>  	.read_reg = nsmmu_read_reg,
>  	.write_reg = nsmmu_write_reg,
>  	.read_reg64 = nsmmu_read_reg64,
>  	.write_reg64 = nsmmu_write_reg64,
> +	.tlb_sync = nsmmu_tlb_sync,
>  };
>  
>  struct arm_smmu_device *nvidia_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index 46e1641..f5454e71 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -52,9 +52,6 @@
>   */
>  #define QCOM_DUMMY_VAL -1
>  
> -#define TLB_LOOP_TIMEOUT		1000000	/* 1s! */
> -#define TLB_SPIN_COUNT			10
> -
>  #define MSI_IOVA_BASE			0x8000000
>  #define MSI_IOVA_LENGTH			0x100000
>  
> @@ -244,6 +241,11 @@ static void __arm_smmu_tlb_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page,
>  	unsigned int spin_cnt, delay;
>  	u32 reg;
>  
> +	if (smmu->impl->tlb_sync) {
> +		smmu->impl->tlb_sync(smmu, page, sync, status);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +

Wouldn't it work if you replaced all calls of __arm_smmu_tlb_sync() by
smmu->impl->tlb_sync() and assign __arm_smmu_tlb_sync() as default for
devices that don't need to override it? That makes this patch slightly
larger, but it saves us one level of indirection.

> +
>  	arm_smmu_writel(smmu, page, sync, QCOM_DUMMY_VAL);
>  	for (delay = 1; delay < TLB_LOOP_TIMEOUT; delay *= 2) {
>  		for (spin_cnt = TLB_SPIN_COUNT; spin_cnt > 0; spin_cnt--) {
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h
> index 9645bf1..d3217f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h
> @@ -207,6 +207,8 @@ enum arm_smmu_cbar_type {
>  /* Maximum number of context banks per SMMU */
>  #define ARM_SMMU_MAX_CBS		128
>  
> +#define TLB_LOOP_TIMEOUT		1000000	/* 1s! */
> +#define TLB_SPIN_COUNT			10
>  
>  /* Shared driver definitions */
>  enum arm_smmu_arch_version {
> @@ -336,6 +338,8 @@ struct arm_smmu_impl {
>  	int (*cfg_probe)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
>  	int (*reset)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
>  	int (*init_context)(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain);
> +	void (*tlb_sync)(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, int page, int sync,
> +			 int status);

Can't page, sync and status all be unsigned?

Thierry
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel