Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: use both ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32

From: Catalin Marinas <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 18:19:39 +0100

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 04:10:41PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index 8956c22634dd..f02a4945aeac 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,13 @@
>  s64 memstart_addr __ro_after_init = -1;
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(memstart_addr);
>  
> +/*
> + * We create both ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32. ZONE_DMA covers the first 1G of
> + * memory as some devices, namely the Raspberry Pi 4, have peripherals with
> + * this limited view of the memory. ZONE_DMA32 will cover the rest of the 32
> + * bit addressable memory area.
> + */
> +phys_addr_t arm64_dma_phys_limit __ro_after_init;
>  phys_addr_t arm64_dma32_phys_limit __ro_after_init;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
> @@ -164,9 +171,9 @@ static void __init reserve_elfcorehdr(void)
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP */
>  /*
> - * Return the maximum physical address for ZONE_DMA32 (DMA_BIT_MASK(32)). It
> - * currently assumes that for memory starting above 4G, 32-bit devices will
> - * use a DMA offset.
> + * Return the maximum physical address for ZONE_DMA32 (DMA_BIT_MASK(32)) and
> + * ZONE_DMA (DMA_BIT_MASK(30)) respectively. It currently assumes that for
> + * memory starting above 4G, 32-bit devices will use a DMA offset.
>   */
>  static phys_addr_t __init max_zone_dma32_phys(void)
>  {
> @@ -174,12 +181,23 @@ static phys_addr_t __init max_zone_dma32_phys(void)
>  	return min(offset + (1ULL << 32), memblock_end_of_DRAM());
>  }
>  
> +static phys_addr_t __init max_zone_dma_phys(void)
> +{
> +	phys_addr_t offset = memblock_start_of_DRAM() & GENMASK_ULL(63, 32);
> +
> +	return min(offset + (1ULL << ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS),
> +		   memblock_end_of_DRAM());
> +}

I think we could squash these two functions into a single one with a
"bits" argument that is either 32 or ARCH_ZONE_DMA_BITS.

> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
>  
>  static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
>  {
>  	unsigned long max_zone_pfns[MAX_NR_ZONES]  = {0};
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> +	max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA] = PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma_phys_limit);
> +#endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
>  	max_zone_pfns[ZONE_DMA32] = PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma32_phys_limit);
>  #endif
> @@ -195,13 +213,17 @@ static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
>  	struct memblock_region *reg;
>  	unsigned long zone_size[MAX_NR_ZONES], zhole_size[MAX_NR_ZONES];
>  	unsigned long max_dma32 = min;
> +	unsigned long max_dma = min;
>  
>  	memset(zone_size, 0, sizeof(zone_size));
>  
> -	/* 4GB maximum for 32-bit only capable devices */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> +	max_dma = PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma_phys_limit);
> +	zone_size[ZONE_DMA] = max_dma - min;
> +#endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
>  	max_dma32 = PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma32_phys_limit);
> -	zone_size[ZONE_DMA32] = max_dma32 - min;
> +	zone_size[ZONE_DMA32] = max_dma32 - max_dma;
>  #endif
>  	zone_size[ZONE_NORMAL] = max - max_dma32;

Does this still work if we have ZONE_DMA32 disabled but ZONE_DMA
enabled? You could use a max(max_dma32, max_dma) or just update
max_dma32 to max_dma in the CONFIG_ZONE_DMA block.

> @@ -213,11 +235,17 @@ static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
>  
>  		if (start >= max)
>  			continue;
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> +		if (start < max_dma) {
> +			unsigned long dma_end = min_not_zero(end, max_dma);
> +			zhole_size[ZONE_DMA] -= dma_end - start;
> +		}
> +#endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
>  		if (start < max_dma32) {
> -			unsigned long dma_end = min(end, max_dma32);
> -			zhole_size[ZONE_DMA32] -= dma_end - start;
> +			unsigned long dma32_end = min(end, max_dma32);
> +			unsigned long dma32_start = max(start, max_dma);
> +			zhole_size[ZONE_DMA32] -= dma32_end - dma32_start;
>  		}
>  #endif
>  		if (end > max_dma32) {

Similar comment here.

-- 
Catalin

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel