Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: imx8mm: Remove incorrect fallback compatible for ocotp

From: Daniel Lezcano <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:17:28 +0200

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 09:05:49AM +0000, Anson Huang wrote:
> Hi, Daniel
> 
> > On 11/09/2019 16:24, Anson Huang wrote:
> > > Compared to i.MX7D, i.MX8MM has different ocotp layout, so it should
> > > NOT use "fsl,imx7d-ocotp" as ocotp's fallback compatible, remove it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <[email-masked]>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > index 5f9d0da..7c4dcce 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@
> > >  			};
> > >
> > >  			ocotp: ocotp-ctrl@30350000 {
> > > -				compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-ocotp", "fsl,imx7d-
> > ocotp", "syscon";
> > > +				compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-ocotp", "syscon";
> > >  				reg = <0x30350000 0x10000>;
> > >  				clocks = <&clk IMX8MM_CLK_OCOTP_ROOT>;
> > >  				/* For nvmem subnodes */
> > 
> > Why not fold the two patches?
> 
> For i.MX8MM, it just removes the incorrect fallback compatible, for i.MX8MN, it needs
> to replace the incorrect fallback compatible in order to support SoC UID read, so I think
> this should be 2 separate patch?

Oh, yes, there is a subtle difference in the file name :) m|n. I understand
now why you splitted it.

-- 

 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel