Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] PCI: layerscape: Add EP mode support for ls1088a and ls2088a

From: Andrew Murray <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:49:46 +0100

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 01:47:36AM +0000, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrew Murray <[email-masked]>
> > Sent: 2019年9月2日 20:46
> > To: Xiaowei Bao <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; Leo
> > Li <[email-masked]>; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; M.h.
> > Lian <[email-masked]>; Mingkai Hu <[email-masked]>; Roy
> > Zang <[email-masked]>; [email-masked];
> > [email-masked]; [email-masked];
> > [email-masked]; [email-masked];
> > [email-masked]; [email-masked];
> > [email-masked]; [email-masked]; Z.q. Hou
> > <[email-masked]>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/11] PCI: layerscape: Add EP mode support for
> > ls1088a and ls2088a
> > 
> > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 11:17:14AM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> > > Add PCIe EP mode support for ls1088a and ls2088a, there are some
> > > difference between LS1 and LS2 platform, so refactor the code of the
> > > EP driver.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <[email-masked]>
> > > ---
> > > v2:
> > >  - This is a new patch for supporting the ls1088a and ls2088a platform.
> > > v3:
> > >  - Adjust the some struct assignment order in probe function.
> > >
> > >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 72
> > > +++++++++++++++++++-------
> > >  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > index 5f0cb99..723bbe5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > @@ -20,27 +20,29 @@
> > >
> > >  #define PCIE_DBI2_OFFSET		0x1000	/* DBI2 base address*/
> > >
> > > -struct ls_pcie_ep {
> > > -	struct dw_pcie		*pci;
> > > -	struct pci_epc_features	*ls_epc;
> > > +#define to_ls_pcie_ep(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> > > +
> > > +struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata {
> > > +	u32				func_offset;
> > > +	const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops	*ops;
> > > +	const struct dw_pcie_ops	*dw_pcie_ops;
> > >  };
> > >
> > > -#define to_ls_pcie_ep(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> > > +struct ls_pcie_ep {
> > > +	struct dw_pcie			*pci;
> > > +	struct pci_epc_features		*ls_epc;
> > > +	const struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata *drvdata; };
> > >
> > >  static int ls_pcie_establish_link(struct dw_pcie *pci)  {
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -static const struct dw_pcie_ops ls_pcie_ep_ops = {
> > > +static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_ls_pcie_ep_ops = {
> > >  	.start_link = ls_pcie_establish_link,  };
> > >
> > > -static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = {
> > > -	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls-pcie-ep",},
> > > -	{ },
> > > -};
> > > -
> > >  static const struct pci_epc_features*  ls_pcie_ep_get_features(struct
> > > dw_pcie_ep *ep)  { @@ -87,10 +89,39 @@ static int
> > > ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
> > >  	}
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -static const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops pcie_ep_ops = {
> > > +static unsigned int ls_pcie_ep_func_conf_select(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep,
> > > +						u8 func_no)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > > +	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
> > > +
> > > +	WARN_ON(func_no && !pcie->drvdata->func_offset);
> > > +	return pcie->drvdata->func_offset * func_no; }
> > > +
> > > +static const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops ls_pcie_ep_ops = {
> > >  	.ep_init = ls_pcie_ep_init,
> > >  	.raise_irq = ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq,
> > >  	.get_features = ls_pcie_ep_get_features,
> > > +	.func_conf_select = ls_pcie_ep_func_conf_select, };
> > > +
> > > +static const struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata ls1_ep_drvdata = {
> > > +	.ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops,
> > > +	.dw_pcie_ops = &dw_ls_pcie_ep_ops,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata ls2_ep_drvdata = {
> > > +	.func_offset = 0x20000,
> > > +	.ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops,
> > > +	.dw_pcie_ops = &dw_ls_pcie_ep_ops,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = {
> > > +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1046a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls1_ep_drvdata },
> > > +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls1088a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls2_ep_drvdata },
> > > +	{ .compatible = "fsl,ls2088a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls2_ep_drvdata },
> > > +	{ },
> > 
> > This removes support for "fsl,ls-pcie-ep" - was that intentional? If you do plan
> > to drop it please make sure you explain why in the commit message. See also
> > my comments in your dt-binding patch.
> 
> In fact, the u-boot will fixup the status property to 'status = enabled' in PCI node of 
> the DTS base on "fsl,ls-pcie-ep" compatible, so "fsl,ls-pcie-ep" is used, I used this
> compatible before, because the driver only support the LS1046a, but this time, I add
> the LS1088a and LS2088a support, and these two boards have some difference form
> LS1046a, so I changed the compatible. I am not sure whether need to add "fsl,ls-pcie-ep"
> in there, could you give some advice, thanks a lot.

It sounds like "fsl,ls-pcie-ep" can be a fallback for "fsl,ls1046a-pcie-ep".

I'm assuming that if someone used "fsl,ls1046a-pcie-ep" on ls1088a or ls2088a
hardware it would still work, but without the multiple PF support.

I.e. if "fsl,ls-pcie-ep" is given, treat it as ls1046a.

Thanks,

Andrew Murray

> 
> Thanks 
> Xiaowei
>  
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Andrew Murray
> > 
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  static int __init ls_add_pcie_ep(struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie, @@ -103,7
> > > +134,7 @@ static int __init ls_add_pcie_ep(struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie,
> > >  	int ret;
> > >
> > >  	ep = &pci->ep;
> > > -	ep->ops = &pcie_ep_ops;
> > > +	ep->ops = pcie->drvdata->ops;
> > >
> > >  	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> > "addr_space");
> > >  	if (!res)
> > > @@ -142,20 +173,23 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > >  	if (!ls_epc)
> > >  		return -ENOMEM;
> > >
> > > -	dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> > "regs");
> > > -	pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base);
> > > -	if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
> > > -		return PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base);
> > > +	pcie->drvdata = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > >
> > > -	pci->dbi_base2 = pci->dbi_base + PCIE_DBI2_OFFSET;
> > >  	pci->dev = dev;
> > > -	pci->ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops;
> > > -	pcie->pci = pci;
> > > +	pci->ops = pcie->drvdata->dw_pcie_ops;
> > >
> > >  	ls_epc->bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4),
> > >
> > > +	pcie->pci = pci;
> > >  	pcie->ls_epc = ls_epc;
> > >
> > > +	dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> > "regs");
> > > +	pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base);
> > > +	if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
> > > +		return PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base);
> > > +
> > > +	pci->dbi_base2 = pci->dbi_base + PCIE_DBI2_OFFSET;
> > > +
> > >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
> > >
> > >  	ret = ls_add_pcie_ep(pcie, pdev);
> > > --
> > > 2.9.5
> > >

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel