Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] OMAP3: PM: Set/clear T2 bit for Smartreflex on TWL

From: Tony Lindgren <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:09:37 -0700

* Adam Ford <[email-masked]> [190912 19:00]:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:29 PM André Roth <[email-masked]> wrote:
> >
> > From: Thara Gopinath <[email-masked]>
> >
> > Voltage control on TWL can be done using VMODE/I2C1/I2C_SR.
> > Since almost all platforms use I2C_SR on omap3, omap3_twl_init by
> > default expects that OMAP's I2C_SR is plugged in to TWL's I2C
> > and calls omap3_twl_set_sr_bit. On platforms where I2C_SR is not connected,
> > the board files are expected to call omap3_twl_set_sr_bit(false) to
> > ensure that I2C_SR path is not set for voltage control and prevent
> > the default behavior of omap3_twl_init.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[email-masked]>
> > Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <[email-masked]>
> > Signed-off-by: Shweta Gulati <[email-masked]>
> > Cc: [email-masked]
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <[email-masked]>
> 
> Tony,
> 
> Is there a status update on this series?  It's been several months,
> and I haven't seen any feedback on it, nor does it appear to be in any
> of your branches that I can see.

Well it was tagged RFC.. Does something need updating
with it?

At least the first two patches looked OK to me.

Regards,

Tony

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel