[PATCH 09/50] arm64: Add loglvl to dump_backtrace()

From: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista•com>
To: linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse•com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm•com>,
	Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista•com>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love•SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation•org>,
	Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail•com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux•org.uk>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis•org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail•com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse•com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation•org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel•org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel•org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/50] arm64: Add loglvl to dump_backtrace()
Date: Wed,  6 Nov 2019 03:05:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191106030542.868541-10-dima@arista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191106030542.868541-1-dima@arista.com>

Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on
a platform or user).

Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages.
And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs,
but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk()
was deferred.

Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems
an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers.
Also, it will consolidate printings with headers.

Add log level argument to dump_backtrace() as a preparation for
introducing show_stack_loglvl().

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm•com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux•org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel•org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista•com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h |  3 ++-
 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c         |  2 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c           | 17 +++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index 4d9b1f48dc39..fdb913cc0bcb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -64,7 +64,8 @@ struct stackframe {
 extern int unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame);
 extern void walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame,
 			    int (*fn)(struct stackframe *, void *), void *data);
-extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk);
+extern void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
+			   const char *loglvl);
 
 DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long *, irq_stack_ptr);
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index 71f788cd2b18..1a6b58b1be2c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
 void show_regs(struct pt_regs * regs)
 {
 	__show_regs(regs);
-	dump_backtrace(regs, NULL);
+	dump_backtrace(regs, NULL, KERN_DEFAULT);
 }
 
 static void tls_thread_flush(void)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
index 34739e80211b..59072c7b9fb4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -52,9 +52,9 @@ static const char *handler[]= {
 
 int show_unhandled_signals = 0;
 
-static void dump_backtrace_entry(unsigned long where)
+static void dump_backtrace_entry(unsigned long where, const char *loglvl)
 {
-	printk(" %pS\n", (void *)where);
+	printk("%s %pS\n", loglvl, (void *)where);
 }
 
 static void dump_kernel_instr(const char *lvl, struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -82,12 +82,13 @@ static void dump_kernel_instr(const char *lvl, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	printk("%sCode: %s\n", lvl, str);
 }
 
-void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
+void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk,
+		    const char *loglvl)
 {
 	struct stackframe frame;
 	int skip = 0;
 
-	pr_debug("%s(regs = %p tsk = %p)\n", __func__, regs, tsk);
+	printk("%s%s(regs = %p tsk = %p)\n", loglvl, __func__, regs, tsk);
 
 	if (regs) {
 		if (user_mode(regs))
@@ -114,11 +115,11 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
 				thread_saved_pc(tsk));
 	}
 
-	printk("Call trace:\n");
+	printk("%sCall trace:\n", loglvl);
 	do {
 		/* skip until specified stack frame */
 		if (!skip) {
-			dump_backtrace_entry(frame.pc);
+			dump_backtrace_entry(frame.pc, loglvl);
 		} else if (frame.fp == regs->regs[29]) {
 			skip = 0;
 			/*
@@ -128,7 +129,7 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
 			 * at which an exception has taken place, use regs->pc
 			 * instead.
 			 */
-			dump_backtrace_entry(regs->pc);
+			dump_backtrace_entry(regs->pc, loglvl);
 		}
 	} while (!unwind_frame(tsk, &frame));
 
@@ -137,7 +138,7 @@ void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
 
 void show_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *sp)
 {
-	dump_backtrace(NULL, tsk);
+	dump_backtrace(NULL, tsk, KERN_DEFAULT);
 	barrier();
 }
 
-- 
2.23.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
