Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: add sama5d3 pmc driver

From: [email-masked]
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 16:11:23 -0800

From: Stephen Boyd <[email-masked]>

Quoting Alexandre Belloni (2020-01-09 13:41:28)
> On 09/01/2020 10:19:09-0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Alexandre Belloni (2020-01-08 03:02:18)
> > > 
> > > As for the other PMC driver, we need a few of the peripheral clocks very
> > > early which means that we would have to register most of the clock tree
> > > registered early leaving only a few clocks to be registered by a
> > > platform driver.
> > > 
> > 
> > What peripheral clks? Can you add a comment to the code?
> > 
> 
> The TCB is used as the clocksource so its clock is needed. Its parent is
> the master clock which has UTMI, PLLA, the mainclock and the slow clock
> as parents so by that point, most of the tree is registered.
> 

What in sama5d3_periphck[] is in that list? I still don't see why
platform device is rejected here.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel