Subject: Re: omap-secure.c:undefined reference to `__arm_smccc_smc'

From: Tony Lindgren <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 09:13:05 -0800

* Tony Lindgren <[email-masked]> [200220 16:37]:
> * Andrew F. Davis <[email-masked]> [200220 16:24]:
> > On 2/20/20 11:20 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Andrew F. Davis <[email-masked]> [200220 16:04]:
> > >> On 2/20/20 10:54 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > >>> Andrew,
> > >>>
> > >>> * kbuild test robot <[email-masked]> [200213 10:27]:
> > >>>> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > >>>> head:   0bf999f9c5e74c7ecf9dafb527146601e5c848b9
> > >>>> commit: c37baa06f8a970e4a533d41f7d33e5e57de5ad25 ARM: OMAP2+: Fix undefined reference to omap_secure_init
> > >>>> date:   3 weeks ago
> > >>>> config: arm-randconfig-a001-20200213 (attached as .config)
> > >>>> compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 7.5.0
> > >>>> reproduce:
> > >>>>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > >>>>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > >>>>         git checkout c37baa06f8a970e4a533d41f7d33e5e57de5ad25
> > >>>>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > >>>>         GCC_VERSION=7.5.0 make.cross ARCH=arm 
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> > >>>> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <[email-masked]>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > >>>>
> > >>>>    arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.o: In function `omap_smccc_smc':
> > >>>>>> omap-secure.c:(.text+0x94): undefined reference to `__arm_smccc_smc'
> > >>>
> > >>> Have you looked at this one? Looks like there's still an unhandled
> > >>> randconfig build case.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I've had a quick look, all the ARM config does:
> > >>
> > >> select HAVE_ARM_SMCCC if CPU_V7
> > >>
> > >> so I don't think this will happen in any real config, but if we want to
> > >> prevent randconfig issue this we could force ARCH_OMAP2PLUS to "depend"
> > >> on it.
> > > 
> > > Seems to happen at least with omap2 only config where we don't have
> > > CPU_V7. Something like below seems to fix it.
> > > 
> > > If that looks OK to you, I'll send out a proper fix.
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > This looks fine to me.
> > 
> > A better later fix might be to later stub out the actual __arm_smccc_smc
> > in common code if CONFIG_HAVE_ARM_SMCCC is not set, so any platform will
> > get the fix.
> 
> Yeah seems that might be better. Adding Aaro and Marc to Cc.

But if we can in theory have some arm11 machine with smccc, then this
local ifdef below is probably the way to go.

Regards,

Tony

> > > 8< -----------------------
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c
> > > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ u32 omap_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 flag, u32 nargs, u32 arg1, u32 arg2,
> > >  	return ret;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARM_SMCCC
> > >  void omap_smccc_smc(u32 fn, u32 arg)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct arm_smccc_res res;
> > > @@ -85,6 +86,11 @@ void omap_smccc_smc(u32 fn, u32 arg)
> > >  		      0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
> > >  	WARN(res.a0, "Secure function call 0x%08x failed\n", fn);
> > >  }
> > > +#else
> > > +void omap_smccc_smc(u32 fn, u32 arg)
> > > +{
> > > +}
> > > +#endif
> > >  
> > >  void omap_smc1(u32 fn, u32 arg)
> > >  {
> > > 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel