Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/18] clocksource: Replace setup_irq() by request_irq()

From: afzal mohammed <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:21:55 +0530

Hi,

On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:52:55AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:

> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

And thanks for the report, i will try to improve :)

> [auto build test ERROR on tip/timers/core]
> [also build test ERROR on arm-soc/for-next powerpc/next linus/master v5.6-rc3 next-20200221]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
> improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
> base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

i did use --base option w/ git format-patch, though the output of it
was rigged to indicate a human understandable start point that can be
parsed by the script as well.

In cover letter, there was "base-commit: v5.6-rc1", test robot cannot
make use of that information ?, since my thought was that your script
would create a branch with any valid start point following
"base-commit:"

>    drivers/clocksource/timer-prima2.c: In function 'sirfsoc_prima2_timer_init':
> >> drivers/clocksource/timer-prima2.c:213:2: error: 'sirfsoc_timer_irq' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'sirfsoc_timer_read'?
>      sirfsoc_timer_irq.irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0);
>      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>      sirfsoc_timer_read
>    drivers/clocksource/timer-prima2.c:213:2: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in

Does the robot keep the log of patches that are successfully built ?,
w/ v1, i did not receive similar report, and tried to find if test
robot has successfully built v1, but couldn't find out.

Regards
afzal

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel