Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] dt-bindings: arm: Fixup the DT bindings for hierarchical PSCI states

From: Rob Herring <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 08:53:14 -0600

On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 09:50:08PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 18:06, Rob Herring <[email-masked]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 04:07:47PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > The hierarchical topology with power-domain should be described through
> > > child nodes, rather than as currently described in the PSCI root node. Fix
> > > this by adding a patternProperties with a corresponding reference to the
> > > power-domain DT binding.
> > >
> > > Additionally, update the example to conform to the new pattern, but also to
> > > the adjusted domain-idle-state DT binding.
> > >
> > > Fixes: a3f048b5424e ("dt: psci: Update DT bindings to support hierarchical PSCI states")
> > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email-masked]>
> > > ---
> > >  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml         | 33 +++++++++----------
> > >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml
> > > index 0bc3c43a525a..cae668b61265 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.yaml
> > > @@ -102,11 +102,15 @@ properties:
> > >        [1] Kernel documentation - ARM idle states bindings
> > >          Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.yaml
> > >
> > > -  "#power-domain-cells":
> > > -    description:
> > > -      The number of cells in a PM domain specifier as per binding in [3].
> > > -      Must be 0 as to represent a single PM domain.
> > > +required:
> > > +  - compatible
> > > +  - method
> >
> > No need to move this.
> 
> Okay.
> 
> >
> > >
> > > +patternProperties:
> > > +  "^(power-controller|power-domain)([@-].*)?$":
> > > +    $ref: "../power/power-domain.yaml#"
> >
> > This has to be under an 'allOf' or the rest of the properties are
> > ignored.
> 
> Sure, I had the feeling that something was missing. Thanks for reviewing!
> 
> [...]
> 
> Looks like I should a v2 of the series, or do you prefer to apply some
> of the patches before I resend?

Applied 1-3. I'll wait for v2 of 4 and 5.

Rob

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel