Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] clk: tegra: Add PLLP_UD and PLLMB_UD for Tegra210

From: Thierry Reding <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:05:08 +0100

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 07:19:59PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 10.03.2020 18:19, Thierry Reding пишет:
> > From: Joseph Lo <[email-masked]>
> > 
> > Introduce the low jitter path of PLLP and PLLMB which can be used as EMC
> > clock source.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo <[email-masked]>
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email-masked]>
> > ---
> >  drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c         | 11 +++++++++++
> >  include/dt-bindings/clock/tegra210-car.h |  4 ++--
> >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
> > index 45d54ead30bc..f99647b4a71f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c
> > @@ -3161,6 +3161,17 @@ static void __init tegra210_pll_init(void __iomem *clk_base,
> >  	clk_register_clkdev(clk, "pll_m_ud", NULL);
> >  	clks[TEGRA210_CLK_PLL_M_UD] = clk;
> >  
> > +	/* PLLMB_UD */
> > +	clk = clk_register_fixed_factor(NULL, "pll_mb_ud", "pll_mb",
> > +					CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 1, 1);
> > +	clk_register_clkdev(clk, "pll_mb_ud", NULL);
> > +	clks[TEGRA210_CLK_PLL_MB_UD] = clk;
> > +
> > +	/* PLLP_UD */
> > +	clk = clk_register_fixed_factor(NULL, "pll_p_ud", "pll_p",
> > +					0, 1, 1);
> > +	clks[TEGRA210_CLK_PLL_P_UD] = clk;
> 
> Isn't it possible to auto-enable the low-jitter bit when necessary
> during of the rate-change based on a given clock-rate?

I don't think so. These new clocks (pll_mb_ud and pll_p_ud) are parents
for the emc clock, so they are needed to properly reflect the position
of the emc clock in the clock tree.

Thierry
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel