Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] clk: tegra: Implement Tegra210 EMC clock

From: Thierry Reding <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:10:25 +0100

On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 07:26:28PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 10.03.2020 18:19, Thierry Reding пишет:
> > From: Joseph Lo <[email-masked]>
> > 
> > The EMC clock needs to carefully coordinate with the EMC controller
> > programming to make sure external memory can be properly clocked. Do so
> > by hooking up the EMC clock with an EMC provider that will specify which
> > rates are supported by the EMC and provide a callback to use for setting
> > the clock rate at the EMC.
> > 
> > Based on work by Peter De Schrijver <[email-masked]>.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo <[email-masked]>
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email-masked]>
> > ---
> > Changes in v5:
> > - major rework and cleanup
> 
> ...
> 
> > +u32 emc_readl(struct tegra_emc *emc, unsigned long offset)
> > +{
> > +	return readl_relaxed(emc->emc_base[REG_EMC] + offset);
> > +}
> 
> static u32 emc_readl()
> 
> > +u32 emc_readl_per_ch(struct tegra_emc *emc, int type,
> > +			    unsigned long offset)
> 
> static u32 emc_readl_per_ch()

I think something went wrong here during a rebase. These are actually
supposed to be part of the EMC driver patch and are no longer needed in
the clock driver.

Thierry
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel