Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/4] pwm: sun4i: Remove redundant needs_delay

From: Pascal Roeleven <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:59:03 +0100

'needs_delay' does now always evaluate to true, so remove all
occurrences.

Signed-off-by: Pascal Roeleven <[email-masked]>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 13 ++-----------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
index 3e3efa6c7..5c677c563 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
@@ -90,7 +90,6 @@ struct sun4i_pwm_chip {
 	spinlock_t ctrl_lock;
 	const struct sun4i_pwm_data *data;
 	unsigned long next_period[2];
-	bool needs_delay[2];
 };
 
 static inline struct sun4i_pwm_chip *to_sun4i_pwm_chip(struct pwm_chip *chip)
@@ -287,7 +286,6 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, val, PWM_CH_PRD(pwm->hwpwm));
 	sun4i_pwm->next_period[pwm->hwpwm] = jiffies +
 		usecs_to_jiffies(cstate.period / 1000 + 1);
-	sun4i_pwm->needs_delay[pwm->hwpwm] = true;
 
 	if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
 		ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_ACT_STATE, pwm->hwpwm);
@@ -298,7 +296,7 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 
 	if (state->enabled) {
 		ctrl |= BIT_CH(PWM_EN, pwm->hwpwm);
-	} else if (!sun4i_pwm->needs_delay[pwm->hwpwm]) {
+	} else {
 		ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_EN, pwm->hwpwm);
 		ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_CLK_GATING, pwm->hwpwm);
 	}
@@ -310,15 +308,9 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 	if (state->enabled)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (!sun4i_pwm->needs_delay[pwm->hwpwm]) {
-		clk_disable_unprepare(sun4i_pwm->clk);
-		return 0;
-	}
-
 	/* We need a full period to elapse before disabling the channel. */
 	now = jiffies;
-	if (sun4i_pwm->needs_delay[pwm->hwpwm] &&
-	    time_before(now, sun4i_pwm->next_period[pwm->hwpwm])) {
+	if (time_before(now, sun4i_pwm->next_period[pwm->hwpwm])) {
 		delay_us = jiffies_to_usecs(sun4i_pwm->next_period[pwm->hwpwm] -
 					   now);
 		if ((delay_us / 500) > MAX_UDELAY_MS)
@@ -326,7 +318,6 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
 		else
 			usleep_range(delay_us, delay_us * 2);
 	}
-	sun4i_pwm->needs_delay[pwm->hwpwm] = false;
 
 	spin_lock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
 	ctrl = sun4i_pwm_readl(sun4i_pwm, PWM_CTRL_REG);
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel