Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/stm32: Retrigger both in eoi and unmask callbacks

From: Marc Zyngier <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:10:25 +0000

On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 00:51:32 +0100
Marek Vasut <[email-masked]> wrote:

> Sampling the IRQ line state in EOI and retriggering the interrupt to
> work around missing level-triggered interrupt support only works for
> non-threaded interrupts. Threaded interrupts must be retriggered the
> same way in unmask callback.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Alexandre Torgue <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Jason Cooper <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <[email-masked]>,
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked]
> To: [email-masked]
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> index 9ac9ecfc2f34..2dd4a4dd944c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> @@ -304,18 +304,22 @@ static const struct gpio_chip stm32_gpio_template = {
>  	.get_direction		= stm32_gpio_get_direction,
>  };
>  
> -void stm32_gpio_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
> +static void stm32_gpio_irq_trigger(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
>  	struct stm32_gpio_bank *bank = d->domain->host_data;
>  	int level;
>  
> -	irq_chip_eoi_parent(d);
> -
>  	/* If level interrupt type then retrig */
>  	level = stm32_gpio_get(&bank->gpio_chip, d->hwirq);
>  	if ((level == 0 && bank->irq_type[d->hwirq] == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW) ||
>  	    (level == 1 && bank->irq_type[d->hwirq] == IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH))
>  		irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy(d);
> +}
> +
> +void stm32_gpio_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d)

This should obviously be static. I'll amend it locally.

> +{
> +	irq_chip_eoi_parent(d);
> +	stm32_gpio_irq_trigger(d);
>  };
>  
>  static int stm32_gpio_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> @@ -371,12 +375,18 @@ static void stm32_gpio_irq_release_resources(struct irq_data *irq_data)
>  	gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(&bank->gpio_chip, irq_data->hwirq);
>  }
>  
> +static void stm32_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +	irq_chip_unmask_parent(d);
> +	stm32_gpio_irq_trigger(d);
> +}
> +
>  static struct irq_chip stm32_gpio_irq_chip = {
>  	.name		= "stm32gpio",
>  	.irq_eoi	= stm32_gpio_irq_eoi,
>  	.irq_ack	= irq_chip_ack_parent,
>  	.irq_mask	= irq_chip_mask_parent,
> -	.irq_unmask	= irq_chip_unmask_parent,
> +	.irq_unmask	= stm32_gpio_irq_unmask,
>  	.irq_set_type	= stm32_gpio_set_type,
>  	.irq_set_wake	= irq_chip_set_wake_parent,
>  	.irq_request_resources = stm32_gpio_irq_request_resources,

I'll queue this for 5.7.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel