Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: Simplify error handling path in hidma_probe

From: Dan Carpenter <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:54:26 +0300

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 01:10:43PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> There is no need to call 'hidma_debug_uninit()' in the error handling
> path. 'hidma_debug_init()' has not been called yet.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c
> index 411f91fde734..87490e125bc3 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c
> @@ -897,7 +897,6 @@ static int hidma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (msi)
            ^^^
This test doesn't work.  It will call free hidma_free_msis() if the
hidma_request_msi() call fails.  We should do:

	if (msi) {
		rc = hidma_request_msi(dmadev, pdev);
		msi = false;
	}

	if (!msi) {
		hidma_ll_setup_irq(dmadev->lldev, false);
		rc = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, chirq, hidma_chirq_handler,
				      0, "qcom-hidma", dmadev->lldev);
		if (rc)
			goto uninit;
	}

>  		hidma_free_msis(dmadev);
>  
> -	hidma_debug_uninit(dmadev);
>  	hidma_ll_uninit(dmadev->lldev);
>  dmafree:
>  	if (dmadev)
            ^^^^^^
This test isn't necessary and should be deleted.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel