Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] soc: ti: omap-prm: Add basic power domain support

From: Tony Lindgren <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 08:18:19 -0700

* Tero Kristo <[email-masked]> [200514 08:05]:
> On 12/05/2020 23:38, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > +struct omap_prm_domain {
> > +	struct device *dev;
> > +	struct omap_prm *prm;
> > +	struct generic_pm_domain pd;
> > +	void __iomem *pwrstctrl;
> > +	void __iomem *pwrstst;
> 
> I think the pwrstst is not really used as of now, it is just part of couple
> of dev_dbg prints.

Yes to me it seems the pwrstst only changes later on.

> > +static int omap_prm_domain_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
> > +{
> > +	struct omap_prm_domain *prmd;
> > +	u32 v;
> > +
> > +	prmd = genpd_to_prm_domain(domain);
> > +	if (!prmd->cap)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	dev_dbg(prmd->dev, "%s: %s: old state: pwrstctrl: %08x pwrstst: %08x\n",
> > +		__func__, prmd->pd.name, readl_relaxed(prmd->pwrstctrl),
> > +		readl_relaxed(prmd->pwrstst));
> > +
> > +	if (prmd->pwrstctrl_saved)
> > +		v = prmd->pwrstctrl_saved;
> > +	else
> > +		v = readl_relaxed(prmd->pwrstctrl);
> > +
> > +	writel_relaxed(v | OMAP_PRMD_ON_ACTIVE, prmd->pwrstctrl);
> > +	dev_dbg(prmd->dev, "%s: %s: new state pwrstctrl: %08x\n",
> > +		__func__, prmd->pd.name, readl_relaxed(prmd->pwrstctrl));
> 
> Should we wait for the transition to complete here?

Good idea :)

> > +	v &= ~PRM_POWERSTATE_MASK;
> > +	v |= omap_prm_domain_find_lowest(prmd);
> > +
> > +	if (prmd->cap->statechange)
> > +		v |= PRM_LOWPOWERSTATECHANGE;
> > +	if (prmd->cap->logicretstate)
> > +		v &= ~PRM_LOGICRETSTATE;
> > +	else
> > +		v |= PRM_LOGICRETSTATE;
> > +
> > +	writel_relaxed(v, prmd->pwrstctrl);
> 
> Should we wait for the transition to complete here?

Would be nice yeah.

> Is any of the following clock handling needed, and if yes, whats its
> purpose?
> 
> It looks like this is only used for ABE clkctrl handling on omap4/omap5 (at
> least for now), but afaik, ABE clkctrl is read only so this code would
> effectively do nothing (and potentially just even fail.)

Yeah this seems unnecessary, let's plan on leaving it out. I think the
clocks in the l4_abe dst changes are actually handled by simple-pm-bus,
not this driver, I was just confused :)

Regards,

Tony

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel