Subject: [PATCH 07/24] KVM: arm64: Use cpus_have_final_cap for has_vhe()

From: Marc Zyngier <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 17:01:04 +0100

By the time we start using the has_vhe() helper, we have long
discovered whether we are running VHE or not. It thus makes
sense to use cpus_have_final_cap() instead of cpus_have_const_cap(),
which leads to a small text size reduction.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email-masked]>
Acked-by: David Brazdil <[email-masked]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email-masked]
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
index 61fd26752adc..5051b388c654 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static inline bool is_kernel_in_hyp_mode(void)
 
 static __always_inline bool has_vhe(void)
 {
-	if (cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN))
+	if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN))
 		return true;
 
 	return false;
-- 
2.26.2

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel