Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dma-direct: provide the ability to reserve per-numa CMA

From: Dan Carpenter <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 11:57:51 +0300

On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 06:04:31AM +0000, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:[email-masked]]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 11:37 PM
> > To: [email-masked]; Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
> > <[email-masked]>; [email-masked]; [email-masked];
> > [email-masked]; [email-masked]
> > Cc: [email-masked]; Dan Carpenter <[email-masked]>;
> > [email-masked]; [email-masked];
> > [email-masked]; [email-masked]; Linuxarm
> > <[email-masked]>; Jonathan Cameron
> > <[email-masked]>; John Garry <[email-masked]>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dma-direct: provide the ability to reserve per-numa
> > CMA
> > 
> > Hi Barry,
> > 
> > url:
> > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Barry-Song/support-per-numa-CM
> > A-for-ARM-server/20200603-104821
> > base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
> > for-next/core
> > config: x86_64-randconfig-m001-20200603 (attached as .config)
> > compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-13) 9.3.0
> > 
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email-masked]>
> > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email-masked]>
> 
> Dan, thanks! Good catch!
> as this patch has not been in mainline yet, is it correct to add these "reported-by" in patch v2?

These are just an automated email from the zero day bot.  I look over
the Smatch warnings and then forward them on.

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel