Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: rng: add RNGB compatibles for i.MX6 SoCs

From: Rob Herring <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 18:03:52 -0600

On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 05:56:54PM +0300, Horia Geantă wrote:
> RNGB block is found in some i.MX6 SoCs - 6SL, 6SLL, 6ULL, 6ULZ.
> Add corresponding compatible strings.
> 
> Note:
> 
> Several NXP SoC from QorIQ family (P1010, P1023, P4080, P3041, P5020)
> also have a RNGB, however it's part of the CAAM
> (Cryptograhic Accelerator and Assurance Module) crypto accelerator.
> In this case, RNGB is managed in the caam driver
> (drivers/crypto/caam/), since it's tightly related to
> the caam "job ring" interface, not to mention CAAM internally relying on
> RNGB as source of randomness.
> 
> On the other hand, the i.MX6 SoCs with RNGB have a DCP
> (Data Co-Processor) crypto accelerator and this block and RNGB
> are independent.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Horia Geantă <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/imx-rng.txt | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/imx-rng.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/imx-rng.txt
> index 405c2b00ccb0..eb227db9e684 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/imx-rng.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/imx-rng.txt
> @@ -5,6 +5,9 @@ Required properties:
>                 "fsl,imx21-rnga"
>                 "fsl,imx31-rnga" (backward compatible with "fsl,imx21-rnga")
>                 "fsl,imx25-rngb"
> +               "fsl,imx6sl-rngb"
> +               "fsl,imx6sll-rngb"
> +               "fsl,imx6ull-rngb"

These are all different? IOW, no fallback compatible?

>                 "fsl,imx35-rngc"
>  - reg : offset and length of the register set of this block
>  - interrupts : the interrupt number for the RNG block
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel