Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: stm32-dac: Replace indio_dev->mlock with own device lock

From: Jonathan Cameron <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:52:30 +0100

On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 12:18:02 +0200
Fabrice Gasnier <[email-masked]> wrote:

> On 9/16/20 11:23 AM, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> > From: Sergiu Cuciurean <[email-masked]>
> > 
> > As part of the general cleanup of indio_dev->mlock, this change replaces
> > it with a local lock. The lock protects against potential races when
> > reading the CR reg and then updating, so that the state of pm_runtime
> > is consistent between the two operations.
> > 
> > This is part of a bigger cleanup.
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/CA+U=[email-masked]/
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sergiu Cuciurean <[email-masked]>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <[email-masked]>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c | 13 +++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)  
> 
> Hi Alexandru,
> 
> Many thanks for this updated patch,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Fabrice Gasnier <[email-masked]>

Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for
the autobuilders to poke at it.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> 
> Best regards,
> Fabrice
> 
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c b/drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c
> > index 092c796fa3d9..12dec68c16f7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/stm32-dac.c
> > @@ -26,9 +26,12 @@
> >  /**
> >   * struct stm32_dac - private data of DAC driver
> >   * @common:		reference to DAC common data
> > + * @lock:		lock to protect against potential races when reading
> > + *			and update CR, to keep it in sync with pm_runtime
> >   */
> >  struct stm32_dac {
> >  	struct stm32_dac_common *common;
> > +	struct mutex		lock;
> >  };
> >  
> >  static int stm32_dac_is_enabled(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int channel)
> > @@ -58,10 +61,10 @@ static int stm32_dac_set_enable_state(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int ch,
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> >  	/* already enabled / disabled ? */
> > -	mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> > +	mutex_lock(&dac->lock);
> >  	ret = stm32_dac_is_enabled(indio_dev, ch);
> >  	if (ret < 0 || enable == !!ret) {
> > -		mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> > +		mutex_unlock(&dac->lock);
> >  		return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> >  	}
> >  
> > @@ -69,13 +72,13 @@ static int stm32_dac_set_enable_state(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int ch,
> >  		ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> >  		if (ret < 0) {
> >  			pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
> > -			mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> > +			mutex_unlock(&dac->lock);
> >  			return ret;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	ret = regmap_update_bits(dac->common->regmap, STM32_DAC_CR, msk, en);
> > -	mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> > +	mutex_unlock(&dac->lock);
> >  	if (ret < 0) {
> >  		dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "%s failed\n", en ?
> >  			"Enable" : "Disable");
> > @@ -327,6 +330,8 @@ static int stm32_dac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	indio_dev->info = &stm32_dac_iio_info;
> >  	indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> >  
> > +	mutex_init(&dac->lock);
> > +
> >  	ret = stm32_dac_chan_of_init(indio_dev);
> >  	if (ret < 0)
> >  		return ret;
> >   

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel